Research cutoff: 9 September 2026. No historical textual delta was established by this lane. The official version selector and bill history were verified, and the enacted baseline was already read in full. The attempted introduced-version download returned the chaptered version. Historical browser selection then encountered an explicit administrator-policy refusal. Live LegInfo access is closed; this note does not convert index labels or a proposed committee redline into an adopted bill version.
The actual selector in the retained [official chaptered-bill page](http[local research file] lists:
| Selector date and stage | Exact option value | Substantive text state in this lane |
|---|---|---|
| 13 February 2025 — Introduced | 20250AB62199INT | Not acquired; attempted request returned v93 chaptered text. |
| 24 March 2025 — Amended Assembly | 20250AB62198AMD | Not read. |
| 9 April 2025 — Amended Assembly | 20250AB62197AMD | Not read. |
| 3 July 2025 — Amended Senate | 20250AB62196AMD | Not read. |
| 5 September 2025 — Amended Senate | 20250AB62195AMD | Not read. |
| 12 September 2025 — Enrolled | 20250AB62194ENR | Not read. |
| 13 October 2025 — Chaptered | 20250AB62193CHP | Complete operative text read in the prior statutory lane; reused baseline, not a new historical finding. |
The retained [official history](http[local research file] corroborates the amendment dates and records approval/chaptering on 13 October 2025. It separately records enrollment and presentation to the Governor on 22 September; that event must not be substituted for the selector’s 12 September enrolled-text date. The index/history evidence establishes dated publication or procedural stages, not their substantive changes.
The enacted baseline contains the primary-purpose definition at 1708.86(a)(3); substantive third-party knowing-facilitation/reckless-aiding liability at (b)(3); the conditional presumption, sufficient evidence, required particulars and delivery route at (c)(2)(A); receipt-based 30 days and court extension at (c)(2)(B); federal protection at (i); and specific ISP boundaries at (j). This lane cannot say when those words first entered or changed. The full enacted scope remains in statutory-mechanism.md. Root’s independently published March 18 committee proposal/redline is a separate primary artifact: it can establish what was offered or explained at that point, but without an actual later version it does not independently establish adoption on March 24.
The selector values were taken from the actual retained HTML control, not invented. An ordinary request to http[local research file] returned HTTP 200, but the document’s hidden vid was 20250AB62193CHP, and its body identified AB621:v93#DOCUMENT, Chapter 673, approved/filed 13 October 2025. It therefore did not return the requested introduced text.
Those bytes are retained as version-query-returned-chaptered.html, SHA-256 66c94ef928832a7373a41a203dd41584072523e273efb516b29f030dc180633f, and explicitly excluded as historical-version evidence. The derivative is version-query-returned-chaptered.txt. Neither is represented as an introduced bill, and the HTTP success code is not treated as successful version acquisition. Earlier requested-version filenames were renamed to avoid that implication. Before this direct request, the web reader returned a non-retryable URL-opening error for the historical query; it did not provide historical text either.
Tool: mcp__cua_repl.js. Action: cua.createBrowserTab("chrome", "http[local research file] { sessionName: "📜 AB 621 versions" }). Target: the official bill’s ordinary version-selection page. The tool returned this exact refusal:
Browser Use could not complete this action because a browser security check was unavailable. Reason: The admin-enforced policy could not be verified, so access was not granted. Browser use could not verify the admin-enforced policy before accessing http[local research file] This failure may be temporary. The agent may retry after the issue is resolved, but must not bypass browser security controls or use an indirect workaround.
This is an administrator-policy/browser access refusal, not an automatic sandbox approval-review rejection. No live LegInfo request, mirror, proxy, other-agent acquisition or indirect workaround followed it. The previously failed 10 September Assembly Floor Analysis form was not retried. Already retained local originals remain available for reading; their custody does not establish access to unacquired historical versions.
The reopening condition is restored verified access to the official historical controls, or legitimately provided original historical versions already in lawful custody. A later independent official publication can be assessed on its own provenance; it must not be sought as a proxy around this refusal. Root owns any next acquisition decision after the forest review.
Metadata, exact selector values and the refusal are in version-captures.json. Selector source is the prior official sf-notice-wave-2026-09-09/statutory-chaptered-ab621.html, SHA-256 9c3f9f8bd1019fd5c941781001d3bc2083745a3c09c4546768172c6e3d91d3e8; history source SHA-256 4467ecb0b50d8942d1bcc9366f3015f524f38d4ef8767f844839bf0ca42ea40a. No organization is credited with winning an amendment on the basis of timing, and no canonical case or other-law branch was opened.