← Red Threads

Claim and evidence index

This index accompanies the current consolidated account. Stable IDs below are checked against accepted r33, including the six additional packets. Scoped note anchors retain the evidence and read limits behind those graph relationships. Several edges can depend on one source. These are traceable evidence bundles, not independent witness counts. The account and index use the retained 9 September 2026 cutoff.

A1 — FLI resources

Case relationships: e44, e46, w2-fli-e-lightcone25.

Source records: src-e4e7930e8216, w2-fli-s-audit25.

Fli findings

Tegmark lightcone followup

A2 — Creator mechanisms

Case relationships: e74, w1-creator-e-pf-terms, w1-creator-e-output-fli, w1-creator-e-frame-ltff, w1-creator-e-frame-aitof, w1-creator-e-rational-partnership.

Source records: src-65df3f2c31b3, src-c33ab812f862, w1-creator-s-controlai-rational, w1-creator-s-frame-public-ui-script, w1-creator-s-mateus, w1-creator-s-rational.

Creator findings

A3 — ControlAI authority

Case relationships: w1-controlai-e-uk-formal-authority, w1-controlai-e-us-payable.

Source records: w1-controlai-s-uk-articles, w1-controlai-s-us-return.

Controlai findings

A4 — Red Lines production

Case relationships: w8-red-e-work-segerie, w8-red-e-work-niki, w8-red-e-work-controlai, w8-red-e-work-fli, w8-red-e-signature-hubinger, w8-red-e-ctrl-interpretation.

Source records: w8-red-s-ack, w8-red-s-controlai, w8-red-s-signatories.

Campaign formation

A5 — Common donor and divergent interventions

Case relationships: w31-fa-e-oakcma, w31-fa-e-oakstatewatch, w31-fa-e-oakdff, w31-fa-e-swcsaposition, w32-gdi-e-libertyfiled.

Source records: src-12639f108d96, src-5046aaa630e7, w31-fa-s-swcsa, w32-gdi-s-judgment, w32-gdi-s-libertyfiling.

Statewatch divergence

Proceedings

A6 — Selection and execution

Case relationships: w32-gdi-e-peerselection, w32-gdi-e-staffsupport, w32-gdi-e-terms, w32-gdi-e-juneselection.

Source records: w31-fa-s-dffround, w32-gdi-s-dffadoption, w32-gdi-s-dffpeer.

Allocation governance

A7 — Duty model and narrowing

Case relationships: w10-duty-e-carnegie-review, w10-duty-e-reset-review, w10-duty-e-review-draft, w10-duty-e-research-narrower, w11-fund-e-carnegie-programme, w11-fund-e-mckinnon-functioning.

Source records: w10-duty-s-announcement, w10-duty-s-carnegie2022, w10-duty-s-draft, w10-duty-s-reset70, w10-duty-s-review, w11-fund-s-carnegie2021, w11-fund-s-carnegie2023, w11-fund-s-functioning-report, w11-fund-s-mckinnon-commissions.

Operative authority

Policy lineage

A8 — UK method choice and selective uptake

Case relationships: w7-policy-e-email-accepted, w31-fa-e-checks, w31-fa-e-clearance, w31-fa-e-ffinput, w31-fa-e-noticerecommendation, w31-fa-e-declinemonetization.

Source records: w31-fa-s-cmasub, w31-fa-s-crisis, w31-fa-s-fullfact, w7-policy-s-part5, w7-policy-s-statement2025.

Policy findings

Submission findings

Disposition status

Fullfact origin

A9 — Shared signals

Case relationships: w22-sig-e-meta-case, w22-sig-e-case-signals, w22-sig-e-xbox-outcome.

Source records: w22-sig-s-report2025.

Lantern

Lantern rights review

A10 — Interfaces and correction

Case relationships: w26-ver-e-qs-controls-ohf, w26-ver-e-hash-api-deletions, w26-ver-e-tat-analyst-feedback, w26-ver-e-altitude-source-input.

Source records: w26-ver-s-altitude-tcap-adapter, w26-ver-s-archive-feedback, w26-ver-s-archive-hash-api, w26-ver-s-ohf-control.

Archive access

Correction protocol

Protocol independent review

A11 — MATCH and judicial bridge

Case relationships: w30-class-e-match-inquiry, w30-class-e-stripe-policy, w30-class-e-stripe-match-effect, w30-class-e-filmon-to-egumball, w30-class-e-egumball-slapp-disposition.

Source records: w30-class-s-egumball2025, w30-class-s-filmon-opinion, w30-class-s-match-rules, w30-class-s-stripe-match.

Acquirer implementation

Later disposition

A12 — Customer remedies

Case relationships: w23-cash-e-restriction-duty, w23-cash-e-historical-recourse, w24-ag-e-july-assent, w24-ag-e-july-redress, w24-ag-e-credits-cfpb, w24-ag-e-fallback-approval, w24-ag-e-naag-reimbursement.

Source records: w23-cash-s-cfpb-order, w23-cash-s-issuer2026q2, w24-ag-s-july-ca, w24-ag-s-july-or.

Cfpb

A13 — Police and infrastructure

Case relationships: w29-enf-e-iwf-historical-membership, w29-enf-e-pilot-design-ipo, w30-class-e-creative-tactics.

Source records: w29-enf-s-funding2026, w29-enf-s-iwf2013, w30-class-s-creative-guidance.

Policy authority

Funding resources

List authority

Origins transmission

A14 — DV and counterpressure

Case relationships: w30-class-e-senate-tag-pressure, w30-class-e-default-announced-hi-category, w30-class-e-default-reported-hi-category, w30-class-e-tag-determination, w30-class-e-complaint-cma-allegation.

Source records: w30-class-s-dv-complaint, w30-class-s-dv-defaults, w30-class-s-dv-progress, w30-class-s-senate-tag, w30-class-s-tag-release, w30-class-s-tag-report.

Policy pressure

Category authority

Current product

A15 — Dated stablecoin supplement

Scoped retained notes are the evidence anchors; no supplemental graph relationship is invented.

Stablecoin control check 2026 09 09

A16 — GDI historical discontinuity and recourse

Case relationships: w32-gdi-e-oraclepackages, w32-gdi-e-oracleend, w32-gdi-e-iasdiscontinues, w32-gdi-e-appealstanding, w32-gdi-e-ratingrevision.

Source records: w32-gdi-s-fonevidence, w32-gdi-s-iasexit, w32-gdi-s-oracle, w32-gdi-s-oracleend.

Gdi mechanism

Recourse findings

A17 — Research funding and proposed use

Case relationships: w32-gdi-e-fundedremit, w32-gdi-e-ecgerman, w32-gdi-e-gdicontribution, w32-gdi-e-warningmethod, w32-gdi-e-humanvalidation, w32-gdi-e-requestedplatformrole.

Source records: w32-gdi-s-cdmd, w32-gdi-s-cordis, w32-gdi-s-d21, w32-gdi-s-fcdoanswer, w32-gdi-s-finalreport, w32-gdi-s-gdiresearch.

Fcdo findings

Horizon findings

Classification findings

A18 — Access gates

Case relationships: w33-con-e-vetting, w33-con-e-fundingdisclosure, w33-con-e-publicaccess, w33-con-e-priority, w33-con-e-publish.

Source records: w33-con-s-definition, w33-con-s-delegated, w33-con-s-dsa.

Root law findings

Gates findings

A19 — Binding access oversight

Case relationships: w33-con-e-nominatepay, w33-con-e-approveankura, w33-con-e-mandate, w33-con-e-monitor, w33-con-e-trustreport.

Source records: w33-con-s-decision, w33-con-s-trustee.

Commitment mechanism

Root enforcement findings

A20 — Positive readiness and no approvals

Case relationships: w33-con-e-ftiopinion, w33-con-e-noapprovals, w33-con-e-legalprocess.

Source records: w33-con-s-audit.

Root audit findings

Oversight findings

A21 — Voluntary reports and unresolved counts

Case relationships: w33-con-e-trackeroutcomes, w33-con-e-alientry, w33-con-e-reasons, w33-con-e-mercator, w33-con-e-bmftr, w33-con-e-berlin.

Source records: w33-con-s-entry, w33-con-s-paper, w33-con-s-tracker.

Root reading

Application findings

A22 — Cross-domain interpretation

Analytical comparison of the preceding evidence. No universal cross-domain pipeline is asserted.

A23 — CDDP evaluation and funding gates

Case relationships: w33-con-e-owcommission, w33-con-e-evalscope, w33-con-e-treasurygate, w33-con-e-satisfaction, w33-con-e-pilotfunding.

Source records: w16-supp-s-foi-bundle, w16-supp-s-foi-release, w33-con-s-round2.

Evaluation and acceptance

A24 — OSDI governance, evaluation reuse and PUBLIC participation

Case relationships: w33-con-e-chairs, w33-con-e-woodgroup, w33-con-e-paevaluate, w33-con-e-publicosdi, w33-con-e-sandboxdelivery, w33-con-e-methodreuse, w33-con-e-publiccddp, w33-con-e-subapproval.

Source records: w16-supp-s-foi-bundle, w33-con-s-cdei, w33-con-s-osdiabout, w33-con-s-pa, w33-con-s-publicclaim, w33-con-s-sandbox, w33-con-s-stcf.

Osdi governance market

Osdi evaluation output

Public cddp

Reading limits

This synthesis uses accepted case records and retained research, with complete reading of the decisive newer notes and selected earlier scopes. It is not a fresh read of every original, all 365 audit pages or every historical branch. Source records retain access states, reading scopes and custody distinctions. The original three-part worker narrative and independent review were delivered in the task when the child hosts could not persist files. Root authored the final account, added the older evaluation/OSDI evidence and checked these references.