Legal mechanism

Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption

CIV 1708.86(c)(2): sufficient evidence, qualifying sender, named service and enabling relationship, designated process if displayed, receipt and30 days; court-extension and statutory protections remain. No automatic liability judgment.

What the records show

AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86Service-specific evidence → conditional presumption

establishes a receipt-based conditional presumption

Effective-date anchor, not receipt of any particular notice or expiration of the legal mechanism.

A depicted individual/public prosecutor must supply sufficient evidence of enabling an ongoing violating service, name it, generally describe enabling services and supply contact details; use prominently displayed designated process if present. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within 30 days after receipt supplies the presumption; a court may extend for investigation. No automatic adjudication or universal30-day immunity.

Further reading

California’s third-party deepfake-service liability route

Read the original source 1

What the connections say

1 relationships
1

AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86establishes a receipt-based conditional presumptionService-specific evidence → conditional presumption

Effective-date anchor, not receipt of any particular notice or expiration of the legal mechanism.

A depicted individual/public prosecutor must supply sufficient evidence of enabling an ongoing violating service, name it, generally describe enabling services and supply contact details; use prominently displayed designated process if present. Failure to take necessary cessation steps within 30 days after receipt supplies the presumption; a court may extend for investigation. No automatic adjudication or universal30-day immunity.

Read the original source 1