Paid warnings, family links and who can publish a review ↗
The interview file: ControlAI sponsorship terms, the Amodei–Karnofsky link, METR's money and Anthropic's pilot publication veto.
RESEARCH
Research notes
The detailed findings, documents and unresolved questions behind the profiles and maps. Search the full text, including the stablecoin and Jacob Coxon follow-ups.
Research notes
221 matchesMicrosoft's draft rules are a governance proposal, not a compliance result ↗
A company-controlled consultation, with model scope and timing limits.
A named streaming-policy lobby, not a policy victory ↗
TechNet gives three streaming companies a shared advocacy vehicle focused on access and sports distribution.
UK payment infrastructure: a planned raise, not an operating replacement ↗
A timed report adds a financing step to an older division of public and industry responsibilities.
The EU's proposed age gate comes into focus ↗
Reuters describes an unpublished draft with age tiers, verification duties and provider-funded supervision.
A caucus, a network and a planned visit are different links ↗
Separate reported congressional leadership from a private coalition’s named partners.
A venture firm formalizes its route to policymakers ↗
SV Angel’s appointment and initiative disclose an access mechanism, not an achieved policy result.
Who could stop a model release? A UK committee's proposal ↗
A parliamentary recommendation identifies the proposed decision rights and the responsibility problem behind them.
PayPal changes the route for challenging PayPal ↗
A previously announced contractual change reaches its stated effective date.
CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route ↗
The proposed financial controls matter at the level of triggers, defendants and exceptions.
Australia can now compel more of the evidence behind age checks ↗
The enacted amendment closes a legal-status gap and clarifies the regulator's power and safeguards.
Google brings age estimation to Canadian accounts ↗
An announced geographic expansion connects inferred age to platform access.
AI pacing meets competing political demands ↗
China’s response and Johnson’s position show why lab agreement does not settle public policy.
The coalition was here before the surge ↗
A March declaration and September assembly reveal a concrete organizing sequence.
Sanders’s ASI proposal: what the released document says ↗
Testing a viral account against the sponsors’ published summary.
Gates and Anthropic: follow the infrastructure ↗
A joint commitment links models, public-service data and implementation partners.
Who evaluates the evaluators? Money, access and the METR network ↗
Canary, public contracts and professional bridges make the evaluation layer visible.
AI safety meets public ownership: who gets the board seats? ↗
A September appearance leads back to distinct June proposals for public equity, corporate governance and independent testing.
Pliny, Andreessen and the grant ↗
A confirmed a16z award and a reported personal grant: one payment or two?
BASI: the outsiders testing the inside ↗
Open AI experimentation meets grants, collective research and frontier-lab evaluation.
Australia: who gets to define the next online harm? ↗
Wells offers negotiation over Parliament’s role in adding duty-of-care harms.
Frontier pacing: the evaluator moves inside ↗
Anthropic’s announcement would put outside reviewers inside the company and underpin wider coordination.
California’s AI auditor laws are enacted ↗
Who qualifies evaluators, who pays them and how the new registration regime will operate.
ControlAI’s disclosed US lobbying operation ↗
Quarterly costs, named lobbyists and a disclosed UK-US institutional link.
Money, audiences and decision rights ↗
A synthesis of the Civic Shout, Andreessen, Karp and Tallinn follow-up: how resources become decisions and obligations.
Funding policy work and organizing ↗
CLTR commitments and policy proposals, PauseAI eligibility conditions, and the distinct powers they create.
Alex Karp: contracts, control and AI access ↗
Founder voting, government orders, model integration, political funding and the limits preserved by the August 2026 Anthropic court ruling.
Marc Andreessen: capital and policy ↗
The investment, political-giving, governance and policy routes around Andreessen and a16z, and what those records do not establish.
Civic Shout: the business behind the petition ↗
Supporter acquisition, campaign incentives, political purchases, fiscal sponsorship, the distinct organizational names and new Frame grant disclosures.
Tallinn: the selected payment records ↗
Dates, vehicles, named payees, purposes and amounts for the historical funding paths.