Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Publication
6May2019 reversal uses context/audience/purpose; rejects categorical commercial-speech exclusion without ordering accuracy/remedy.
Supreme Court of California → FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision
2019-05-06 – 2019-05-06
6May2019 Court reversed the prior appellate judgment under public-interest catchall, while rejecting FilmOn's categorical commercial/noncommercial approach. It ordered no reclassification, damages, ad purchase or restoration.
FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision → eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal
2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23
2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database.
eGumball later disposition: a failed procedural shield, not delisting ↗
FilmOn classification litigation: a paid label, an attempted correction, and a procedural limit ↗
FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision → supplied expressly applied legal framework → eGumball G062863M anti-SLAPP appeal
2025-04-23 – 2025-04-23
2025 eGumball opinion expressly applies FilmOn's audience/purpose/context analysis to confidential payment reporting. This is a judicial-precedent route, not shared ownership, classifier or database.
Supreme Court of California → reversed protection for these confidential reports → FilmOn S244157 public-interest anti-SLAPP decision
2019-05-06 – 2019-05-06
6May2019 Court reversed the prior appellate judgment under public-interest catchall, while rejecting FilmOn's categorical commercial/noncommercial approach. It ordered no reclassification, damages, ad purchase or restoration.