Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Publication
ORG-letterhead letter to Ofcom/technology companies, published by Statewatch4August2025; Statewatch signatory visible onPDF5. Requests, legal allegations, receipt and actual corrective outcomes are distinct.
OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025 → Ofcom
2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04
The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established.
Statewatch → OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025
2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04
Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence.
Oak support and Statewatch: a specific limit on the common-funder inference ↗
Statewatch → was a signatory to a published safeguards letter → OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025
2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04
Statewatch is visibly listed onPDF5 of the ORG-letterhead letter. Publisher date is4August2025; upload path is not that date. The distinct DSIT meeting on the same date is not joined by coincidence.
OSA protest-expression safeguards letter — August2025 → requested clarification, transparency and conditional remedies → Ofcom
2025-08-04 – 2025-08-04
The letter seeks clarity about OSA/protest-expression effects, transparency and impacts, appeal/restoration where appropriate and independent dispute mechanisms. Proscription/detention and legal claims remain attributed; no regulator receipt, response or implemented remedy is established.