Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Policy
Current page says members sign confidentiality/conflict terms and are compensated. Actual terms, recusal rules, compensation amounts and appointment/removal provisions remain not obtained.
Peer Group Terms of Reference → DFF Community Peer Group
DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired.
The strongest alternative to a claim of complete authority transfer is that a genuine delegated selection process operates inside an institutional strategy, budget and legal framework whose reserved rights are not disclosed here. The exact discriminating records are the signed Peer Group Terms of Reference and incorporated conflict policy , the March 2026 board adoption/delegation resolution , and the applicable DFF grant agreement or execution policy . The first two would clarify appointment, recusal and the force of selections; the last would locate signature and payment authority. None was read in this bounded pass.
Read the research & sources ↗DFF allocation governance: a real selection role, incomplete legal delegation ↗
Peer Group Terms of Reference → is described as requiring confidentiality and conflict commitments → DFF Community Peer Group
Reported by the cited source
DFF says all members sign Terms of Reference containing confidentiality/conflict policies and receive compensation. Signing is publicly described; operative recusal rules and amounts were not acquired.