Production of public-opinion evidence

Data for Progress

Polling organization publishing September research on an AI pause-and-ban description.

What was measured

The September 4–9 weighted web panel surveyed 1,332 likely US voters. Sixty-eight percent supported and 25 percent opposed a combined pause and prohibition described in the question. It omits prison, dissolution, export controls and agency design, and names neither the bill nor its sponsors. Commissioner or funder not identified.

What the records show

From the investigation

A poll measures its question

Data for Progress’s September 4–9 weighted web panel of 1,332 likely voters found 68% support and 25% opposition for the described combination of a pause and permanent prohibition. The questionnaire neither names the sponsors nor presents prison terms, corporate dissolution, export controls or the new agency’s architecture. It measures support for selected policy components rather than informed approval of the complete legislation. No commissioner or funder was identified in the inspected materials.

Read the research & sources ↗
A poll measures its question

Polling on AI Development Regulation (September 2026) · Data for Progress — AI development pause questionnaire and crosstabs

Read the research & sources ↗

Further reading

Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition

Read the original sources 2

What the connections say

1 relationships
1

Data for ProgressPublishes policy-opinion surveySeptember AI pause-and-ban poll

2026-09-09

Data for Progress published September 4-9 polling on a combined advanced-AI pause and permanent prohibition on systems exceeding human intelligence or resisting shutdown. Question tests a description, not complete legislation; no commissioner/funder identified.

Read the original sources 2