Countervailing voice within the AI-risk debate

Gary Marcus

AI commentator opposing the proposal’s breadth while favoring regulation.

Disagreement over the remedy

Marcus objects to unilateral permanent prohibition while considering a temporary pause and regulator. His postscript favors an Anthony Aguirre formulation allowing narrow tools and conditional high-assurance approval for broader systems. Favoring wording is not a drafting partnership.

What the records show

From the investigation

Conflict remains visible

ITIF publicly opposed the Sanders–Casar prohibition, emphasizing innovation and competition. Gary Marcus also opposed its breadth while arguing for regulation; he favored an alternative formulation by Anthony Aguirre. Casar’s office meanwhile reports actual correspondence demanding security records from OpenAI and Anthropic. The record contains disagreement among regulators’ advocates and conflict between lawmakers and companies. Treating all of them as one camp would erase useful evidence.

Read the research & sources ↗

Further reading

Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition

Read the original source 1

What the connections say

2 relationships