Proposed financial-market legislation

CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substitute

A proposed substitute adds conditional stablecoin-reward restrictions and constrained state ethics-enforcement routes. It has not become law.

Record and limits

A proposed substitute adds conditional stablecoin-reward restrictions and constrained state ethics-enforcement routes. It has not become law.

The two qualified intervention routes

The proposed stablecoin circuit-breaker turns on a time-limited Treasury determination, consultation and rulemaking. Certain state ethics actions would instead follow a specified federal court route, with ethics-office exceptions. Reading the actual triggers and defendants is necessary to understand who could use each proposed power.

What the records show

CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substituteUS Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention

Would confer conditional rulemaking power

Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC

Section 10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury finding within 18 months of enactment of substantial detrimental deposit transfers from banks with assets below $10 billion, specifically tied to regulated activities; rules follow notice/comment and OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve consultation.

CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substituteCLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route

Would create constrained state action

Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC

Proposed 5 USC 13153(d) separates state actions against the US Attorney General over covered-official violations from direct actions against intermediaries over prohibited listing.

Further reading

CLARITY's new enforcement promise has a specific route

Read the original sources 2

What the connections say

2 relationships
1

CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substituteWould confer conditional rulemaking powerUS Treasury Secretary — proposed stablecoin intervention

Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC

Section 10404(c)(3)(C) requires a written Treasury finding within 18 months of enactment of substantial detrimental deposit transfers from banks with assets below $10 billion, specifically tied to regulated activities; rules follow notice/comment and OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve consultation. Proposed authority only; 18 months bounds the determination window, not a proven expiry date for resulting rules.

Read the original sources 2
2

CLARITY Act — September 14 proposed substituteWould create constrained state actionCLARITY draft — state ethics-enforcement route

Observed in noon pass 14 September 2026; scan cutoff 17:00:54 UTC

Proposed 5 USC 13153(d) separates state actions against the US Attorney General over covered-official violations from direct actions against intermediaries over prohibited listing. Certain ethics-office opinions/notices bar the first route; no enacted power or successful lawsuit is established.

Read the original source 1