UK government

No adoption edge proposed for India, UNESCO, UK Government, UNGA, UNSC or Geneva based on this pass. No campaign-funding edge proposed from the UNESCO umbrella funding paragraph. A current institutional co-chair appointment is a separate governance relation, not evidence the appointment was caused by campaign participation.

The paper advocates technically possible client-side protections, but explicitly disclaims UK government policy or requirements and a complete security analysis (PDF10). Its discussion recognises coercion, database manipulation and mission creep; it reports no evidence for its considered charity-funding capture scenario (PDF41–42). It also points to REPHRAIN's separate Safety Tech Challenge Fund evaluation work (PDF6,56). That is not the later Toolbox award or proof of a common programme. Read cover, selected introduction/executive-summary pages, section6.1 and the opening of section8; no full technical validation claimed. Original arXiv PDF retained.

FON0071's GDI and Government Funding section says GDI had received no UK government funding since 2022; describes FCDO Russia-unit Countering Disinformation and Media Development work in 2018–2022 to develop large-scale detection and country studies; and says the supporting grant expired in March 2023. The receipt-period statement and later grant-expiry date are not a self-evident contradiction. It also attributes then-current resources to private foundations, commercial data licensing and a small EU Horizon Europe grant. This is a historical recipient disclosure, not donor-side confirmation, acquired conditions, proof of payment dates or government approval of a particular rating. No funding genealogy was pursued.