CMA asks for creator/advertiser checks, platform review before monetization and sanctions. Its crisis revenue/refund proposal has an explicit regulator response: specific monetization practices were not recommended.
Choose a subject or a numbered connection.
Solid lines: documented in a cited record. Dashed: reported or inferred. Hollow arrows: proposed powers. Choose a connection for its evidence.
These checks concern monetized creators and advertisers, not every viewer. The disposition of other recommendations is unresolved in the accepted source wave; no enacted universal ID, actual ban, refund or automated decision is inferred.
CMA asked Ofcom to address monetization incentives, verification and sanctions. Receipt/publication does not establish adoption of each recommendation.
KYC/KYBC proposals cover creators and advertisers, payment/location signals and repeat violators. No universal viewer-ID rule, prescribed identity document or technical identity database is specified.
CMA would require a monetization decision where risk indicators suggest illegal content, with clearance by provider systems/manual review; a court ruling is not the proposed trigger.
Ofcom explicitly records CMA's revenue/refund request and declines to recommend specific monetization practices for the crisis protocol. Providers retain proportionate advertising-integrity choices; this does not decide CMA's other proposals.
The current scoped roadmap forecasts remaining decisions, while the crisis decision is already published. Neither the forecast nor the September9 issued-code index resolves all CMA proposals or crisis commencement.