Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Authority & records
The crisis statement was published in June and children-code amendments were laid. Their source record does not resolve final crisis commencement. September’s NCII announcement supplies a different measure’s date.
Solid lines: documented in a cited record. Dashed: reported or inferred. Hollow arrows: proposed powers. Choose a connection for its evidence.
The draft’s analysis clock is not a restoration guarantee. September 30 belongs to the NCII measure, not crisis rules. StopNCII is a recommended option with alternatives; no sole-supplier purchase requirement is established. Public partnership terms are in the earlier access reader; this measure does not prove execution.
Ofcom → published crisis protocol recommendations → Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026
2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09
Ofcom's9June2026 statement sets a crisis framework; laid draft and later issue/commencement remain separate stages. No current activation is inferred.
Ofcom → submitted crisis code amendments for parliamentary process → Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft
Submitted2026-06-12; laid2026-06-18; later crisis commencement unresolved.
The draft was submitted12June and laid18June2026; HCWS124 confirms laying and conditional40-day scrutiny then21days after issue. Blanks/brackets are not completed issue or commencement, and40days is not necessarily calendar days.
Laid children-code crisis amendments — June2026 draft → sets analysis timing at crisis end or90days if earlier → Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records
DraftC11.7 expressly sets analysis/improvement timing. It does not itself repeat the statement's separate end-protocol-at90days sentence; neither guarantees restoration of removals.
Ofcom → announced a separate30September2026 NCII measure → NCII hash-matching measure — separate September2026 status
2026-09-09 – 2026-09-09
September9 official news/enforcement sources identify30September for NCII hash-matching. That date is not imported into the crisis protocol or unrelated CMA verification proposals. No named service implementation established.
South West Grid for Learning Trust / SWGfL → was described as providing expertise through a partnership → Ofcom
September9,2026 announcement; actual partnership term unknown.
Reported by the cited source
Ofcom's NCII news describes SWGfL expertise/partnership. Payment, selection, contracting and approval terms were not acquired; this is not authority over Ofcom's code decisions.
Ofcom → declined extending formal crisis-contact obligations to NGOs/fact-checkers → Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026
2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09
The statement records requests for formal contacts and real-time access, encourages relevant collaboration, but declines extending formal contact obligations beyond police. This is a class-level disposition, not proof that every Full Fact data-access demand was individually resolved.
Ofcom → declined a central coordinating role and routine analysis submission → Ofcom crisis protocol recommendations — June2026
2026-06-09 – 2026-06-09
Ofcom declines central cross-service coordination and automatic submission/publication of every post-crisis analysis. It retains supervision/request powers; not every oversight request is rejected.
Ofcom → may seek records for supervision → Provider post-crisis analysis and retained records
Providers retain records and Ofcom may seek them or ask about activation; no universal routine public/submitted ledger was adopted. No particular suppressed record or request is established.