Checked 12 September 2026.
Who gets resources, and on what terms?
The useful next question after finding a donor is what the money enables and what obligations accompany it. This pass found two distinct arrangements: substantial support for a policy organization that asserts strategic independence, and smaller recurring support whose published conditions explicitly require alignment with an organizing movement’s priorities.
CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025 · CLTR: support our work
CLTR: funded capacity, stated independence
CLTR’s report, published in 2025, describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment plus matching up to £3m. It says grant commitments deny funders influence over strategy. Its current support page separately offers expert access and advocacy opportunities. Together these disclose resources and relationship benefits; neither a bank receipt nor a hidden donor veto has been established.
CLTR annual report 2024, published 2025 · CLTR: support our work
What that policy capacity produces
The April 2026 parliamentary submission proposes Cabinet Office AI coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. These are intelligible destinations for institutional capacity: people writing recommendations for who should make which public decisions. Parliamentary publication makes the proposals public; it does not adopt them.
CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee · National Resilience Committee: written evidence index
PauseAI: recurring support has conditions
The stipend rules require agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities. The microgrant rules connect delivery and reporting to future eligibility. Those conditions are a firmer basis for understanding obligation than assuming that everyone sharing a donor takes instructions from them. Individual agreements and actual decisions remain the missing evidence.
PauseAI: volunteer stipends · PauseAI: microgrants
The forest
Power here moves through several bargains. Funders support capacity; organizations provide expertise, access or outputs; public bodies decide what to adopt; campaign organizations condition future support. Some arrangements protect independence and others explicitly narrow discretion. A useful map must preserve that variation, because it tells us where decisions can actually be made—and challenged.