A proposed distribution of public authority

CLTR proposed AI governance architecture

A set of April 2026 recommendations for government AI coordination, oversight and public deliberation.

What the submission asks for

CLTR proposes a Cabinet Office AI Security Coordination Unit, an independent Office for AI Responsibility, departmental adoption leads, parliamentary scrutiny and a permanent Citizens’ AI Council. The council would deliberate; the submission does not give it a veto. These are proposals, not a roster of operating institutions.

CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee ↗National Resilience Committee: written evidence index ↗

What the records show

Centre for Long-Term Resilience → CLTR proposed AI governance architecture

Proposed government AI institutions

Checked 12 September 2026

Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation.

CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee ↗National Resilience Committee: written evidence index ↗

See the connections

Open this part of the network ↗

AI, money & persuasion

Funding policy work and organizing

Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.

Open diagram →

What the connections say

1 relationships

Centre for Long-Term Resilience → Proposed government AI institutions → CLTR proposed AI governance architecture

Checked 12 September 2026

Written evidence submitted 20 April 2026 recommends coordination, independent oversight, parliamentary scrutiny and citizen deliberation. Submission, not enactment or proof of government adoption.

Read the original sources 2

CLTR evidence to the National Resilience Committee National Resilience Committee: written evidence index