Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Reusable regulatory architecture endorsed by another advocacy organization
Reset.Tech Australia's April 2024 Green Paper proposes a five-part model for regulating digital platforms: a duty of care, risk assessment, mitigation, transparency and accountability. It compares European Union, UK and Canadian approaches and presents its framework as a contribution to reform debate.
The Green Paper's table spans existing online harms alongside scams, electoral and public-security concerns, rights, public health and environmental risks. The Human Rights Law Centre's July 2024 submission specifically recommended government adoption of the model. The Australian statutory review separately quoted Reset's own submission 70; HRLC's endorsement need not be treated as an intervening delivery step between Reset and the reviewer.
Reset.Tech Australia → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
April2024 report; exact publication day unknown
Printed6-7/PDF9 five-pillar table covers existing harms, scams, electoral/publicsecurity, rights, publichealth andenvironmental risks; comparesEU/UK/Canadian approaches. Moment-specific contribution to debate, not a sole WEF derivation.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
5July2024 document
Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.
Reset.Tech Australia → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
Recipient advocacy text names Reset and its Green Paper. This edge establishes attributed origin in HRLC submission, not new reading of the complete original or exclusive intellectual ancestry.
Australian duty-of-care policy disposition ↗
From harm vocabulary to proposed Australian legal categories ↗
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → expressly recommends government adopt Reset risk-based model → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
5July2024 document
Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.
Reset.Tech Australia → HRLC explicitly attributes five-pillar model to Reset → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
Reported by the cited source
Recipient advocacy text names Reset and its Green Paper. This edge establishes attributed origin in HRLC submission, not new reading of the complete original or exclusive intellectual ancestry.
Reset.Tech Australia → publishes broader risk model with named international comparators → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
April2024 report; exact publication day unknown
Printed6-7/PDF9 five-pillar table covers existing harms, scams, electoral/publicsecurity, rights, publichealth andenvironmental risks; comparesEU/UK/Canadian approaches. Moment-specific contribution to debate, not a sole WEF derivation.