Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Rights advocacy connecting named policy models to an official consultation
The Human Rights Law Centre's submission dated 5 July 2024 is a formal contribution to Australia's Online Safety Act review. It combines a harm-classification framework, endorsement of a systems-based regulatory model and a request for access to platform data for public-interest scrutiny.
The document expressly recommends Reset's April 2024 Five Pillars approach and uses the WEF's 2023 typology in its discussion of harm. Its access proposal covers vetted researchers and civil-society organizations. Publication on the department's website establishes that these arguments entered the consultation record; the later government response addresses review recommendations, so its positions cannot automatically be read as accepting this entire submission.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
5July2024 document
Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms
Section4.3 PDF9/fn15-18. HRLC use only; external original awaits separate integration. Do not invent an edge to statutory adoption or assume taxonomy itself dictates a ban.
Human Rights Law Centre → HRLC July2024 review submission155
Document date5July2024
Document dated5July2024. Exact receipt day not established; publication on departmental host is not government endorsement.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → HRLC civil-society research-access request
Section5.1.4 PDF11 requests broader direct eligibility than later205B. Do not convert advocacy into granted access.
Human Rights Law Centre → issued review submission → HRLC July2024 review submission155
Document date5July2024
Document dated5July2024. Exact receipt day not established; publication on departmental host is not government endorsement.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → expressly recommends government adopt Reset risk-based model → Reset Five Pillars regulatory model
5July2024 document
Recommendationp5 andsection5p10/fn23 cite April2024 Green Paper. Real named endorsement; no grant allocation, common-coalition agreement or government full-package adoption established.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → expressly adopts typology as harm framework → WEF2023 Typology of Online Harms
Section4.3 PDF9/fn15-18. HRLC use only; external original awaits separate integration. Do not invent an edge to statutory adoption or assume taxonomy itself dictates a ban.
HRLC July2024 review submission155 → requests access for vetted researchers and civil-society organizations → HRLC civil-society research-access request
Section5.1.4 PDF11 requests broader direct eligibility than later205B. Do not convert advocacy into granted access.