Shared analytical infrastructure commissioned by government
Counter-Disinformation Data Platform
The Counter-Disinformation Data Platform is a UK government project intended to support information sharing and analysis of misinformation, disinformation and manipulative behaviour across departments. A January 2026 ministerial answer identifies Faculty Science as its developer.
From pilot funding to development
The October 2021 business case proposed discovery and delivery phases. Treasury announced £8.4 million in Shared Outcomes Fund pilot funding, naming several participating departments and agencies; that announcement is not a supplier-payment ledger. The September 2023 tender covered development, hosting and maintenance with an indicative £500,000–£920,000 budget. Its requirements assign priorities to a DSIT product manager and testing to analysts. The 27 January 2026 answer confirms the named development role, without establishing operational effectiveness or individual referral outcomes.
UK Department for Science,Innovation and Technology → Counter-Disinformation Data Platform
tender assigns government team technical priorities and testing
The DSIT product manager owns sprint priorities and user research; its programme manager leads strategy; analysts test as expert users. A prioritised backlog, government sprint goals and quarterly workshops are proposed working arrangements, not verified practice or supplier authority over policy.
HM Treasury — programme funding/approval role → Counter-Disinformation Data Platform
announced GBP8.4million pilot funding
SharedOutcomesFundRound2CDDP entry namesDCMS,FCDO,HomeOffice,CabinetOffice,MOD,GCHQ,NCSC participation. No proof each supplied data or controlled platform; do not add to supplierprices. Financial details: value: 8,400,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pilot funding; no recipient-payment ledger; period: Shared Outcomes Fund Round2 Payment status: No supplier allocation/disbursement established
Faculty Science Limited → Counter-Disinformation Data Platform
ministerial answer identifies platform development function
Official answer27January2026
The27January2026 answer names Faculty Science; the earlier disclosed order at PDF114 identifies Faculty Science Limited08873131. This is an official role account, not an acceptance audit. The inaccessible later cover with a different registration is not merged or used to infer replacement.
PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand → Counter-Disinformation Data Platform
reports participation in delivery
Undated supplier article namesCDDP among3SOFprojects. Exactwork,commission,fee,legalentity and acceptancedeliverable unknown. OSDIconsortium cannot fill those gaps.
The 27 January 2026 ministerial answer to question 106529 separates two functions: GSN provides analysis of online misinformation/disinformation narratives relevant to UK public safety and national security; Faculty Science develops the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform (CDDP). The question itself misspells the supplier names; the answer is the attribution anchor. This is an official role account, not a technical or effectiveness audit.
PUBLIC itself says it helped deliver three Shared Outcomes Fund projects, including the Counter-Disinformation Data Platform. That supports an attributed claim of participation. It does not specify what PUBLIC delivered for CDDP, whether it held a direct commission or a subcontract, the relevant legal entity, a fee, a work period or an accepted deliverable. The original CDDP procurement link now redirects to the marketplace homepage. The retained official contract, however, exposes a precise missing record: the buyer's approved key-subcontractor identities in the project-management call-off are redacted. That is a credible location where PUBLIC's role might be resolved, without identifying PUBLIC as an obscured entry.
The27January2026 answer names Faculty Science; the earlier disclosed order at PDF114 identifies Faculty Science Limited08873131. This is an official role account, not an acceptance audit. The inaccessible later cover with a different registration is not merged or used to infer replacement.
The DSIT product manager owns sprint priorities and user research; its programme manager leads strategy; analysts test as expert users. A prioritised backlog, government sprint goals and quarterly workshops are proposed working arrangements, not verified practice or supplier authority over policy.
SharedOutcomesFundRound2CDDP entry namesDCMS,FCDO,HomeOffice,CabinetOffice,MOD,GCHQ,NCSC participation. No proof each supplied data or controlled platform; do not add to supplierprices.
Financial details: value: 8,400,000; currency: GBP; kind: announced pilot funding; no recipient-payment ledger; period: Shared Outcomes Fund Round2
Payment status: No supplier allocation/disbursement established
Undated supplier article namesCDDP among3SOFprojects. Exactwork,commission,fee,legalentity and acceptancedeliverable unknown. OSDIconsortium cannot fill those gaps.