Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
External assessor of shared-signal risks and safeguards
BSR produced a commissioned human-rights impact assessment of Lantern, the Tech Coalition's child-safety signal-sharing programme. Its April–August 2023 assessment examined how programme design could affect people across participating services.
The November 2023 report discusses decontextualised signals, cumulative exclusions, legal pressure, review resources and dependence on Meta infrastructure. It is explicitly not an audit or certification, and predates later financial integration. Tech Coalition subsequently reported implementing nine of nineteen recommendations and pursuing or investigating ten. The retained research also identifies later commissioned reviews of financial participation and AI-related signals, but not their full findings.
BSR → Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)
ReportNovember 2023; day unknown.
Describes commitments and risks: decontextualized signals, cumulative exclusions and separate-company appeals. Assessed risks are not observed wrongdoing; scope predates financial integration.
BSR → BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021
2021 assessment; no original after the recorded 403.
Scoped assessment emphasized future organizational risks and recommended appeals, holds, external review and downstream transparency. It is not a current incident finding.
Tech Coalition → BSR
WorkApril–August 2023; reportNovember 2023; contract dates unknown.
BSR report identifies commissioned Lantern assessment, workApril–August 2023. Not certification/audit of later outcomes; no fee established.
BSR warns that decontextualized or erroneous signals can produce cumulative exclusions, requiring separate appeals to each company (PDF25–30). It identifies resource and legal-pressure risks that can undermine review, and dependence on Meta's infrastructure. These are assessed risks, not proven wrongful cases. Its April–August 2023 work predates later financial integration. The report disclaims audit/certification status.
Read the research & sources ↗The report describes commissioned BSR reviews of financial participation and AI-related signals, but not their full findings. It states companies may delete only signals they uploaded, and gives aggregate removals without reasons that separate error correction from retention expiry. Own-policy review is required; shared taxonomy can cover conduct prohibited by platform rules without establishing illegality. The listed cross-platform tags include Steam; a tag is not proof of Steam participation or a particular Steam sanction.
Read the research & sources ↗Human-rights assessment, promised changes and current policy ↗
Lantern: safeguards, correction and the limits of public assurance ↗
Tech Coalition → commissioned Lantern human-rights assessment → BSR
WorkApril–August 2023; reportNovember 2023; contract dates unknown.
BSR report identifies commissioned Lantern assessment, workApril–August 2023. Not certification/audit of later outcomes; no fee established.
BSR → published human-rights risk assessment → Lantern human-rights assessment (2023)
ReportNovember 2023; day unknown.
Describes commitments and risks: decontextualized signals, cumulative exclusions and separate-company appeals. Assessed risks are not observed wrongdoing; scope predates financial integration.
BSR → conducted the assessment with editorial control → BSR assessment for GIFCT — 2021
2021 assessment; no original after the recorded 403.
Scoped assessment emphasized future organizational risks and recommended appeals, holds, external review and downstream transparency. It is not a current incident finding.