Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Distributed investigators with their own enforcement policies
Lantern participants are companies admitted to the Tech Coalition's child-safety signal-sharing programme. The collective covers different operational roles: financial institutions are described as receiving signals, while uploading companies contribute reviewed indicators under programme rules.
Published reports require manual review before upload, recipient investigation before enforcement, and appeals or recourse. Companies must remove signals that are no longer applicable or relevant and notify Tech Coalition. The 2025 report says companies can delete only signals they uploaded. Aggregate removal counts do not distinguish errors from retention expiry, and the retained material does not establish downstream reopening or notification to every prior recipient.
Lantern → Lantern participating companies
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
2024 report requires appeals/recourse, removal of signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notification to Tech Coalition. This is an existing remedy/removal process; downstream recipient notification, reopening and export correction remain unestablished.
Lantern → Lantern participating companies
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
Rules require manual review before upload and recipient investigation before own enforcement. Lantern says it does not facilitate automated enforcement based on signals. Safeguards are stated requirements, not independently audited compliance.
Lantern → Lantern participating companies
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
2025 report says companies may delete only signals they uploaded. Does not prove no administrator can remove signals. Aggregate removals do not identify error corrections or reinstatements.
Lantern participating companies → Lantern signal taxonomy
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
Companies may propose updates; particular proposal/approval records and accepted changes unknown.
Lantern: operational signals, programme control and financial-account decisions ↗
Lantern participating companies → may propose taxonomy updates → Lantern signal taxonomy
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
Companies may propose updates; particular proposal/approval records and accepted changes unknown.
Lantern → requires review and own-policy decisions → Lantern participating companies
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
Rules require manual review before upload and recipient investigation before own enforcement. Lantern says it does not facilitate automated enforcement based on signals. Safeguards are stated requirements, not independently audited compliance.
Lantern → requires recourse, relevant signals and TC notification → Lantern participating companies
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
2024 report requires appeals/recourse, removal of signals no longer applicable or relevant, and notification to Tech Coalition. This is an existing remedy/removal process; downstream recipient notification, reopening and export correction remain unestablished.
Lantern → limits participant deletion to own uploads → Lantern participating companies
Effective interval unknown; public record observed 9 September 2026.
2025 report says companies may delete only signals they uploaded. Does not prove no administrator can remove signals. Aggregate removals do not identify error corrections or reinstatements.