Specific operator subject to continuing judicial obligations
Briver LLC
Briver LLC is the defendant that stipulated to a final judgment in San Francisco's multi-defendant action over websites creating sexually explicit AI transformations of identifiable people. The judgment binds Briver and its defined associated-person scope, rather than every defendant in the case.
What Briver agreed to
The judgment was signed on 29 May 2025 and entered into without proof or admissions of the disputed allegations. It bars specified website operations or assistance, requires defined domains to remain registered but inactive for five years, and requires information and sworn compliance reports. It also imposes $100,000 in civil penalties: $50,000 within thirty days, followed by five $10,000 instalments from July through November 2025. The retained record establishes those obligations, without payment receipts or continuing-compliance evidence.
USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred. Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025
prohibits registration transfer and requires five years of domain inactivity
Five-year obligation measured from effective date; performance not observed.
Paragraph 15 prohibits transferring registration of the defined Briver Websites and requires maintaining their registrations in inactive hold/lock status for five years so the domains do not resolve. Paragraphs 17–18 require no ownership transfer and documentary proof of continued Briver/affiliate registration. This is a non-transfer obligation; there is no missing transfer-recipient question or independent registrar command.
permanently prohibits the specified image-transformation operation
Effective-date anchor; prohibition is permanent, not a one-day or five-year restriction.
Paragraph14 bars owning, operating or aiding/abetting websites using AI to convert clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images. No express consent exception. The five-year domain/reporting period does not expressly terminate this permanent bar.
must deliver network information and recurring compliance proof
2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29
Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.
stipulated to company-specific obligations without admissions
2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29
People and Briver stipulate without taking proof or admitting alleged legal/factual issues; appeal waived. Defined associated-person scope does not merge every captioned defendant or service provider.
may inspect domain-related records for judgment compliance
2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29
Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.
Briver’s signed judgment within People v. Sol Ecom
Read and captured 9 September 2026. The acquired instrument is a stipulated final judgment against Briver LLC in a multi-defendant case, not a judgment against every website or every captioned defendant. Its court signature and filing stamp are visible. The operative obligations are much more specific than the city announcement, while actual payment and continuing compliance remain unverified.
The case is People of the State of California, acting by and through San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu v. Sol Ecom, Inc., et al., CGC-24-617237 , San Francisco Superior Court. The instrument’s stipulating parties are the People and Briver LLC (PDF 2, opening paragraph and ¶4). Its caption includes other defendants; the announcement expressly says litigation continues against remaining defendants. It separately describes allegations that Briver operated two websites. Neither the ten-site outcome nor the full defendant roster can be assigned to this one judgment.
People and Briver stipulate without taking proof or admitting alleged legal/factual issues; appeal waived. Defined associated-person scope does not merge every captioned defendant or service provider.
Effective-date anchor; prohibition is permanent, not a one-day or five-year restriction.
Paragraph14 bars owning, operating or aiding/abetting websites using AI to convert clothed images of identifiable people into nude or sexually explicit images. No express consent exception. The five-year domain/reporting period does not expressly terminate this permanent bar.
Five-year obligation measured from effective date; performance not observed.
Paragraph 15 prohibits transferring registration of the defined Briver Websites and requires maintaining their registrations in inactive hold/lock status for five years so the domains do not resolve. Paragraphs 17–18 require no ownership transfer and documentary proof of continued Briver/affiliate registration. This is a non-transfer obligation; there is no missing transfer-recipient question or independent registrar command.
Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.
USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred.
Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025
Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.