San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

David Chiu — San Francisco City Attorney → acted as City Attorney in this proceeding → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

The named public official acts through the office for the People; public litigation role only.

San Francisco City Attorney’s Office → supplied litigation-based rationale for facilitator liability → AB 621 / Civil Code 1708.86

2025-03-18 – 2025-03-18

Committee staff connects the office’s2024 case and difficulty reaching overseas/fictitious operators to expansion toward enablers, expressly including payment processors. This is a published design rationale, not a recipient-specific liability finding or motive about revenue.

San Francisco City Attorney’s Office → reportedly sent notices to Apple and Google → SF Apple/Google notices — July 2026 reporting

2026-07-16 – 2026-07-16

Reported by the cited source

Chronicle reports July 16 notices, confidential app attachments,28-day response request and threatened civil enforcement. Actual notices, attachments and delivery/receipt records were not acquired.

San Francisco City Attorney’s Office → prosecuted the action for the People → People v. Sol Ecom et al. — CGC-24-617237

Public action described in the court documents; Briver settlement and Sol Ecom alternative-service motion are different parts of the case.

Briver LLC → must deliver network information and recurring compliance proof → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29

Judgment directs the required reports to the People through the notice procedure. No actual paragraph 16 response, attestation or supporting domain record was acquired; not every response is required to be publicly filed.

Briver LLC → owes scheduled civil penalties to the office → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29

USD 100,000 civil penalties:50,000 within 30 days, then five10,000 instalments July 1 through November 1,2025. Not receipt, consumer compensation or settlement fees. Default/interest terms are conditional; no actual default inferred.

Financial details: value: 100,000; currency: USD; kind: civil penalty obligation not receipt; period: USD 50000 within 30 days of29 May 2025; USD 10000 each1 July,1 August,1 September,1 October,1 November 2025

San Francisco City Attorney’s Office → may inspect domain-related records for judgment compliance → Briver LLC

2025-05-29 – 2025-05-29

Reasonable-request inspection of domain registration and related records is solely for compliance with this judgment. No unlimited general data access or exercised inspection established.

San Francisco City Attorney’s Office → reported the wider outcome of its investigation and lawsuit → Ten sites offline or inaccessible in California — reported

2025-06-02 – 2025-06-02

Reported by the cited source

City reported ten sites offline OR inaccessible in California and unnamed registrar/registry cooperation. Does not identify each provider’s act or establish permanent worldwide shutdown. Briver’s judgment is one concrete instrument, not a ten-defendant order.

Cloudflare, Inc. → reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.

Reported by the cited source

Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.

Namecheap, Inc. → reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.

Reported by the cited source

Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff and Drawnudes after a subpoena to their named registrar Namecheap, Inc. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.

Name.com → reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

Production dates not given; these records preceded the12 December 2024 follow-up described in paragraph 24.

Reported by the cited source

Counsel reports responsive contact records for ClothOff from its named former registrar Name.com. The sworn declaration is acquired; underlying subpoenas/productions are not. Private identifiers omitted. No takedown command or execution inferred.

Google → reportedly produced responsive records to a subpoena → San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

2025-06-06 – 2025-06-06

Reported by the cited source

Counsel says Google LLC produced records on6 June 2025 concerning ClothOff and Drawnudes. The declaration is primary sworn testimony about production; actual subpoena/production not acquired. No app, domain or payment shutdown implied.