What the records show
Community Resilience Fund — current terms → Public Safety Canada
limits the department’s stated IP and onward-funding rights
2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25
Recipient copyright remains; a permanent nonexclusive royalty-free departmental licence may be given, not automatic ownership. Redistribution needs prior approval while recipients independently choose beneficiaries and are not government agents. No specific licence/redistribution exercise proved.
Public Safety Canada → Community Resilience Fund — current terms
publishes current budget, report and payment conditions
2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25
Sections 8,12–13,15.2 and 15.4 require approved budgets, selection and reporting/payment controls. Section 9 cautions that advisory-board participation is not control. These May 2026 terms are not proven incorporated in 21415 or 22841.
From the investigation
The new evidence
All three identify Public Safety Canada and (CRF) Community Resilience Fund . Full substantive record fields were read, including expected outcomes. Those expected outcomes concern identifying emerging issues and research/programming gaps, applying relevant initiatives, best practices and partner preparedness; they are not measurable project-specific milestone schedules or proof of outcomes delivered.
Read the research & sources ↗Read the original source 1
What the connections say
2 relationships1Public Safety Canada → publishes current budget, report and payment conditions → Community Resilience Fund — current terms
2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25
Sections 8,12–13,15.2 and 15.4 require approved budgets, selection and reporting/payment controls. Section 9 cautions that advisory-board participation is not control. These May 2026 terms are not proven incorporated in 21415 or 22841.
Read the original source 1
2Community Resilience Fund — current terms → limits the department’s stated IP and onward-funding rights → Public Safety Canada
2026-05-25 – 2026-05-25
Recipient copyright remains; a permanent nonexclusive royalty-free departmental licence may be given, not automatic ownership. Redistribution needs prior approval while recipients independently choose beneficiaries and are not government agents. No specific licence/redistribution exercise proved.
Read the original source 1