Campaign

Christchurch Call

Voluntary multi-sector Call. Community programme direction is distinct from Foundation corporate powers and domestic law.

What the records show

Christchurch Call LeadersChristchurch Call

make the final entry decision in the published joining process

Legacy undated process follows introduction, written intent, cleared applicant response and confidential community discussion. Secretariat convenes; a community participant is not automatically a veto-holder. Current operation and appeal rule unverified.

New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and TradeChristchurch Call

disclosed department-only historic expenditure

2024-04-04 – 2024-04-04

OIA actuals are MFAT-only NZD expenditure through 29 February 2024, not Foundation capitalization or complete multi-party programme costs. Fiscal rows retain their distinct periods.

From the investigation

Custody, source scopes and finite search

Thirteen bounded queries covered the NZ/France handoff, official disclosures and the parent-supplied later grant leads: site:beehive.govt.nz "Christchurch Call Foundation" funding ; site:mfat.govt.nz "Christchurch Call Foundation" funding ; site:elysee.fr "Christchurch Call Foundation" ; site:diplomatie.gouv.fr "Christchurch" "fondation" financement ; site:mfat.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" "transition" funding Foundation ; site:dpmc.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" Foundation ; site:mfat.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" "Foundation" "OIA" ; site:beehive.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" "million" 2024 ; "Christchurch Call Foundation" (transfer OR assets OR secondment OR funding) site:mfat.govt.nz ; "Christchurch Call Foundation" site:treasury.govt.nz ; "Christchurch Call Foundation" "France" "funding" government ; site:carnegie.org "Christchurch Call Foundation" "2026" ; site:search.open.canada.ca "26007" "Christchurch" .

Read the research & sources ↗
Paid depth of support, separate identity

This is not Christchurch Call Foundation's Elevate. Different hosts and stated programmes establish distinct identities despite the shared name. The Canadian CCF contribution must not finance the Coalition's consulting service by name matching.

Read the research & sources ↗
S1 — departmental record of coordinated engagement, launch and funding process

PDF4's Next Steps column, continuing the joint-launch paragraph from PDF3, reports that the US was in the process of granting funding to TAT and links that funding to advancing Christchurch Call commitments. It earns a Canadian-department-reported US funding process as of October 2023 , not an executed or paid US award. The passage does not name the US awarding agency, agreement, amount, exact application/approval stage, conditions or payment. The NSC engagement and US funding statements should remain separate relations; the latter does not identify the NSC as the funder.

Read the research & sources ↗

Further reading

Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money

Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing

Read the original sources 4

What the connections say

3 relationships
2

Christchurch Call Leadersmake the final entry decision in the published joining processChristchurch Call

Legacy undated process follows introduction, written intent, cleared applicant response and confidential community discussion. Secretariat convenes; a community participant is not automatically a veto-holder. Current operation and appeal rule unverified.

Read the original source 1