Structured advisory channel with internal governance and a funding relationship
Christchurch Call Advisory Network
The Christchurch Call Advisory Network provides advice around the Christchurch Call and its Foundation. Its published terms describe its own membership, internal decision process and operating-fund arrangements, making it a distinct organised advisory body within the wider initiative.
How the network governs itself
The terms labelled December 2025 provide a Core of up to 25 members and elected co-chairs. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation, with a two-thirds vote available under a deadline exception. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings. The terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organisation under an agreed memorandum. The acquired record does not identify that fundholder, the amount or an executed memorandum; it establishes the published arrangement rather than a verified transfer.
governs its own admissions, statements and internal decisions
Labelled last-update month, not independently verified adoption date.
December 2025-labelled terms set a Core of at most 25 and co-chair elections. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings.
is assigned operational fund custody in published terms
Unnamed member-organization role holds funds under an agreed memorandum. This is not proof of a particular bank transfer, signed contract or named intermediary.
Christchurch Call Advisory Network → Christchurch Call Foundation
requests consultation and reasons for rejected advice
Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.
Christchurch Call Foundation → Christchurch Call Advisory Network
is described as providing advisory-network funding
Terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. Amount, identity of payer/fundholder and executed memorandum remain not obtained.
Labelled last-update month, not independently verified adoption date.
December 2025-labelled terms set a Core of at most 25 and co-chair elections. Modified consensus allows at most two blockers with two-thirds participation; deadline exception permits a two-thirds vote. Foundation staff are ordinarily excluded from internal meetings.
Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.
Terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. Amount, identity of payer/fundholder and executed memorandum remain not obtained.
Unnamed member-organization role holds funds under an agreed memorandum. This is not proof of a particular bank transfer, signed contract or named intermediary.