Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Institutional bridge from an intergovernmental initiative to funded technical and policy programmes
The Christchurch Call Foundation is the independent support organisation established to carry forward the Christchurch Call's work on terrorist and violent extremist content online. A joint New Zealand–France announcement set 1 July 2024 for the transition of support functions, subsequently reported by New Zealand's foreign ministry.
The 2023 proposal sought a separate legal capacity for broader fundraising, global hiring and secondments; its proposed governance split is not a substitute for the founding instruments. Later records identify philanthropic grants and a Canadian contribution naming The Christchurch Call Foundation as recipient. A ROOST partnership was announced in February 2025, before that Canadian award. The Foundation also contributed a terrorist-content policy pack to ROOST Model Community. The record does not identify a ROOST subaward or transfer of platform enforcement authority.
Carnegie Corporation of New York → Christchurch Call Foundation
2024-12-12 – 2024-12-12
Donor database displays $500,000 over 12 months. Dollar currency unlabelled. Its spinout-in-2023 description differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; preparation versus operation remains a possible explanation, not a settled correction. Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 12 months
Carnegie Corporation of New York → Christchurch Call Foundation
2026-03-05 – 2026-03-05
5 March 2026 trustee approval was announced 10 March: $2 million over 24 months. Approval is not payment or a donor-controlled policy seat; currency not explicitly annotated. Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: unknown; kind: approved grant; period: 24 months
Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal → Christchurch Call Foundation
Summit proposal year, not Foundation incorporation or adoption date.
The 2023 proposal sought broader funding, global hiring and secondments outside government public-finance constraints. Board corporate/financial oversight and Leaders programme direction were proposed; founding appointment rights were left to founding documents.
David and Lucile Packard Foundation → Christchurch Call Foundation
2024
Entry displays $350,000 and Term 36. Neither currency nor term unit is explicitly labelled in the card; no receipt or donor instruction right established. Financial details: value: 350,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 2024
Christchurch Call Foundation → CCF TVEC policy pack
Inspected repository commit, not first contribution date.
README credits partner packs; CCF attribution and annex voice identify contribution beyond filename similarity. Four files include policy, two contextual annexes and evaluation. No funding ledger or authored-by-all-CCF claim.
Canada–CCF contribution 26007 → Christchurch Call Foundation
2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23
The legal recipient is The Christchurch Call Foundation. A ROOST partnership purpose does not turn the whole award into a ROOST payment or identify a subaward.
Christchurch Call Advisory Network → Christchurch Call Foundation
Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.
Christchurch Call Foundation → Christchurch Call Advisory Network
Section 10 supplies a review/feedback route without an express Foundation approval veto.
Thirteen bounded queries covered the NZ/France handoff, official disclosures and the parent-supplied later grant leads: site:beehive.govt.nz "Christchurch Call Foundation" funding ; site:mfat.govt.nz "Christchurch Call Foundation" funding ; site:elysee.fr "Christchurch Call Foundation" ; site:diplomatie.gouv.fr "Christchurch" "fondation" financement ; site:mfat.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" "transition" funding Foundation ; site:dpmc.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" Foundation ; site:mfat.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" "Foundation" "OIA" ; site:beehive.govt.nz "Christchurch Call" "million" 2024 ; "Christchurch Call Foundation" (transfer OR assets OR secondment OR funding) site:mfat.govt.nz ; "Christchurch Call Foundation" site:treasury.govt.nz ; "Christchurch Call Foundation" "France" "funding" government ; site:carnegie.org "Christchurch Call Foundation" "2026" ; site:search.open.canada.ca "26007" "Christchurch" .
Read the research & sources ↗This is not Christchurch Call Foundation's Elevate. Different hosts and stated programmes establish distinct identities despite the shared name. The Canadian CCF contribution must not finance the Coalition's consulting service by name matching.
Read the research & sources ↗Christchurch Call: decision process and advisory money ↗
Christchurch Call Foundation: government handoff and financing ↗
CCF programme and delivery lane — Elevate ↗
Resilient Call — 2023 institutional proposal → proposed a separate legal capacity and oversight split → Christchurch Call Foundation
Summit proposal year, not Foundation incorporation or adoption date.
The 2023 proposal sought broader funding, global hiring and secondments outside government public-finance constraints. Board corporate/financial oversight and Leaders programme direction were proposed; founding appointment rights were left to founding documents.
Call support functions / secretariat → was announced and retrospectively reported as transitioned → Christchurch Call Foundation
2024-07-01 – 2024-07-01
Reported by the cited source
14 May announcement gave 1 July 2024 for Foundation support functions; MFAT annual report confirms transition in its retrospective account. No staff, asset, IP or contract novation instrument acquired.
Christchurch Call Advisory Network → requests consultation and reasons for rejected advice → Christchurch Call Foundation
Section 8 seeks a meaningful advisory route and explanations. It does not confer a general veto over Foundation policy or prove compliance with requests.
Christchurch Call Foundation → is described as providing advisory-network funding → Christchurch Call Advisory Network
Reported by the cited source
Terms describe Foundation funding and operational funds held by a member organization under an agreed memorandum. Amount, identity of payer/fundholder and executed memorandum remain not obtained.
Christchurch Call Foundation → reviews and gives feedback on amended terms → Christchurch Call Advisory Network
Section 10 supplies a review/feedback route without an express Foundation approval veto.
David and Lucile Packard Foundation → publishes a 2024 general-support grant entry → Christchurch Call Foundation
2024
Entry displays $350,000 and Term 36. Neither currency nor term unit is explicitly labelled in the card; no receipt or donor instruction right established.
Financial details: value: 350,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 2024
Carnegie Corporation of New York → publishes a launch grant dated 12 December 2024 → Christchurch Call Foundation
2024-12-12 – 2024-12-12
Donor database displays $500,000 over 12 months. Dollar currency unlabelled. Its spinout-in-2023 description differs from the jointly announced July 2024 operational transition; preparation versus operation remains a possible explanation, not a settled correction.
Financial details: value: 500,000; currency: unknown; kind: published grant; period: 12 months
Carnegie Corporation of New York → announced trustee approval of a further grant → Christchurch Call Foundation
2026-03-05 – 2026-03-05
5 March 2026 trustee approval was announced 10 March: $2 million over 24 months. Approval is not payment or a donor-controlled policy seat; currency not explicitly annotated.
Financial details: value: 2,000,000; currency: unknown; kind: approved grant; period: 24 months
Pivotal Leaders Fund → is named by CCF as a support channel → Christchurch Call Foundation
Reported by the cited source
Current recipient page acknowledges support through Pivotal Leaders Fund. Amount, legal paying entity, restrictions and receipt not acquired; no equivalency or European intermediary instrument inferred.
Canada–CCF contribution 26007 → names CCF as recipient → Christchurch Call Foundation
2025-10-23 – 2025-10-23
The legal recipient is The Christchurch Call Foundation. A ROOST partnership purpose does not turn the whole award into a ROOST payment or identify a subaward.
Christchurch Call Foundation → describes its Elevate programme → CCF Elevate programme
2025-11-12 – 2025-11-12
Reported by the cited source
CCF programme connects contribution support, standards/benchmarks, ROOST tools and community uptake. Exact implementation/acceptance schedules absent; separate from the Coalition consulting service.
Christchurch Call Foundation → announced a technical and information collaboration → ROOST — Robust Open Online Safety Tools Inc
2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10
Reported by the cited source
CCF-authored authorized reprint displayed 10 February 2025, index 12 February, precedes the October Canadian award. Later award scope supports a partnership purpose but supplies no ROOST subaward, budget or deliverable approval agreement.