Institutional home of specialist intellectual-property policing
City of London Police
City of London Police is the public police force within which the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit operates. PIPCU is a police unit, rather than a separately identified corporate grant recipient.
Funding records have different meanings
The 2014 government account calls PIPCU operationally independent and describes IPO support and secondments. A 2018 draft financial plan lists an unconfirmed £1.613 million annual forecast across five years. A later for-decision paper proposes a £0.5 million combined increase across three units without identifying PIPCU's share. Neither figure is a received PIPCU grant. The historical referral guide records police participation in broad priority-setting, while Ashiko's policy separately identifies its suspension authoriser.
City of London Police → Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)
published unconfirmed IPO income forecasts in2018
2018-05-24 – 2018-05-24
Draft financial-plan AppendixB lists£1.613m in each year2018/19–2022/23 as unconfirmed. This is neither a received annual grant nor a signed indexation obligation. Financial details: value: 1,613,000; currency: GBP; kind: unconfirmed annual forecast, repeated across five years; period: 2018/19–2022/23; each year
City of London Police → Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)
included the unit in a combined2025 funding increase proposal
2025-02-10 – 2025-02-10
For-decision paper describes£0.5m combined increase across PIPCU,IFED andDCPCU; no PIPCU share. Paragraph31 places detailed funding streams in non-public Appendix3. This is a proposal/publication boundary, not an approval or concealment inference.
City of London Police → Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU)
hosts the specialist unit
2014-10-23 – 2014-10-23
PIPCU is a police unit, not a separately identified corporate recipient. The2014 government account calls it operationally independent and reports IPO funding and secondments.
City of London Police → Reported 2026/27 PIPCU Service Agreement signing
was attributed participation in the annual agreement signing
Caption/body names Adam Williams and Pete O’Doherty in the signing account. This is text-attributed event evidence, not visual verification of signatures or an executed agreement.
The most useful next documents are the announced 2026–2029 funding agreement and financial/assurance schedule , held by IPO/DSIT and City of London Police; the BPI secondment instrument , held by BPI and the police; and, if publicly issued, the 2027 pilot specification , including eligibility, additionality, priority setting, conflict controls and who accepts contributions. The public budget specifically identifies a non-public detailed schedule; this is a precise record boundary, not proof all grant conditions are secret. No pilot-design or other-unit investigation was opened in this run.
A finite next discriminator is a current public IWL operating procedure or redacted inclusion/challenge decision with timestamps, reasons, reviewer, removal notice and recipient notification. The likely holder is PIPCU/City of London Police; relevant product evidence would be an accepted technical specification or change-event protocol. No claim is made that a particular unpublished document exists. This would distinguish effective correction from list-only deletion and establish whether the dated safeguards remain operative.
PIPCU is a police unit, not a separately identified corporate recipient. The2014 government account calls it operationally independent and reports IPO funding and secondments.
Draft financial-plan AppendixB lists£1.613m in each year2018/19–2022/23 as unconfirmed. This is neither a received annual grant nor a signed indexation obligation.
Financial details: value: 1,613,000; currency: GBP; kind: unconfirmed annual forecast, repeated across five years; period: 2018/19–2022/23; each year
For-decision paper describes£0.5m combined increase across PIPCU,IFED andDCPCU; no PIPCU share. Paragraph31 places detailed funding streams in non-public Appendix3. This is a proposal/publication boundary, not an approval or concealment inference.
Caption/body names Adam Williams and Pete O’Doherty in the signing account. This is text-attributed event evidence, not visual verification of signatures or an executed agreement.