Links grantmaking experience to risk assessment

Ajeya Cotra

METR researcher whose prior work included technical AI safety giving at Coefficient Giving.

Cotra’s METR biography identifies threat modelling and loss-of-control assessment as her current work. It records technical AI safety programme leadership at Coefficient Giving in 2024 and AI giving strategy work in 2025.

The existing Sanders records also place her analysis in political discussion. Those roles explain why she is a salient connection between funding priorities, technical expertise and the public case for intervention.

This connection matters because research priorities shape what expertise and measurement tools become available to policymakers. Grantmaking experience and technical assessment are different roles in that process. The earlier role helps explain her place in the network, while the current work is the relevant basis for reading her assessments. A reader can follow her existing METR relationship and the Sanders citations separately, then ask which specific analysis a political proposal relies upon and whether the proposed intervention follows from that analysis.

Assessment updated 2026-09-14

Detailed records and research

What the records show

Ajeya CotraCoefficient Giving

Former programme and strategy roles

Checked 14 September 2026; event date unresolved

Technical AI safety leadership in 2024; AI giving strategy in 2025.

Sanders’s September 3 AI essayAjeya Cotra

Cites AI-risk assessment

Checked 2026-09-11

Sanders cites Cotra in his public case for legislation.

From the investigation

How research enters the political argument

Sanders’s September 3 essay cites Ajeya Cotra and Dwarkesh Patel to make the case for a pause. METR identifies Cotra as staff and a coauthor of its August incident investigation; it says OpenAI did not pay for that assessment. The essay footer credits Friends of Bernie Sanders. These are observable steps in communication: research, public interpretation, citation by a politician and distribution. They do not establish that the cited people endorse every proposed penalty, or independently verify the incident described.

Read the research & sources ↗
A planned briefing is not completed attendance

Axios named Hinton, Tegmark and Cotra for a planned September 16 Senate briefing. Sanders told CNN he invited every senator, but the rush transcript twice refers to Thursday. The invitation letter was not obtained, leaving the exact date unresolved. These records do not appoint anyone to the proposed advisory board.

Read the research & sources ↗

Further reading

Sanders, Casar and the proposed AI prohibition

Read the original sources 2

What the connections say

4 relationships