Organizes the expertise that guides major philanthropic allocation
Coefficient Giving
Coefficient Giving, formerly Open Philanthropy, researches philanthropic causes and recommends giving opportunities to donors including Good Ventures. Its work helps determine which organizations, fields and projects receive sustained support, including technical AI safety, training and organizations producing government-facing AI policy.
Coefficient Giving is the organization formerly known as Open Philanthropy. Good Ventures identifies it as its philanthropic adviser and credits its team with supporting the foundation’s giving. That role includes investigating causes and opportunities, allowing donors to draw on a professional research and recommendation process when allocating substantial resources.
The importance of that work goes beyond choosing a single project. Sustained support can allow organizations to recruit specialists, establish training programmes or maintain policy capacity. In this network, those choices help explain the institutions available to produce AI-risk research, brief policymakers and develop regulatory ideas. The adviser helps organize the judgments on which major giving decisions depend.
The Centre for Long-Term Resilience provides a concrete policy example. Its 2024 annual report, published in 2025, describes an Open Philanthropy commitment of £4 million over three years, with separate matching offered up to £3 million. CLTR works on government guidance and proposals for AI institutions. Its report says the commitments deny donors influence over strategy and priorities, making a distinction between supporting an institution and directing its particular recommendations.
The historical footprint also includes MIRI, whose contributor list credits Open Philanthropy with about $15.93 million in cumulative support under its stated matching methodology. Talos separately acknowledges Coefficient support. These relationships show the breadth of institution-building around AI and long-term risks. Reading Coefficient alongside Good Ventures clarifies how research, donor decisions and recipient work connect within that funding landscape.
Targeted public searches for ControlAI and/or Secure Future Research in Survival and Flourishing Fund, Coefficient Giving/Open Philanthropy and Manifund did not identify a grant specifically awarded to ControlAI. This is search non-discovery, not an exhaustive database audit or proof no funding occurred.
CAIS has a documented public communications pathway connecting a research nonprofit, a separate policy advocacy nonprofit, and creator training/placement. The historical donor trail reaches Good Ventures (Cari Tuna / Dustin Moskovitz, advised by Open Philanthropy, now Coefficient Giving), SVCF, and FLI. The public evidence does not establish who financed a particular 2026 creator offer, current donor concentration, or donor control of particular videos. A historically indexed October 2023 Good Ventures entry is explicitly labelled an exit grant; do not casually call Open Phil/Good Ventures CAIS's current paymaster.
The most discriminating wider bridge is Talos Network: she self-reports membership, and the publisher's indexed alumni roster identifies her as a 2022 fellow. Talos acknowledges FLI, Coefficient Giving and Survival and Flourishing Fund support. However, the funding disclosure gives no dates or individual allocations, and expressly denies donor involvement in fellow selection, content and strategy. This is a funding-to-career-network connection, not evidence that these donors paid Behrens personally, financed her 2022 place, or command ControlAI.
CLTR’s report, published in 2025, describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment plus matching up to £3m. It says grant commitments deny funders influence over strategy. Its current support page separately offers expert access and advocacy opportunities. Together these disclose resources and relationship benefits; neither a bank receipt nor a hidden donor veto has been established.
Coefficient Giving → Machine Intelligence Research Institute: acknowledged historical support. MIRI reports $15,925,143; cumulative support credit under its stated matching methodology. Total institutional support credits including leveraged matching. Not annual spending,personal payment,current campaign allocation or donor control. Thiel listed among past contributors.
CLTR’s report published in 2025 describes a £4m three-year Open Philanthropy commitment and separate matching up to £3m. Recipient-reported commitments; not £7m of established receipts. Report states grant commitments deny influence over strategic priorities.
The organization now named Coefficient Giving identifies Karnofsky as its former CEO, who stepped down in 2023. Former role, not current grantmaking authority; no direct METR donation is identified by this record.