Builds the organized public pressure behind AI restriction

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI

PauseAI Global, legally Stichting PauseAI, organizes public pressure for a pause in advanced AI development. It supports chapters, coordinates campaigns and provides grants or stipends for organizers. Its published strategy connects public mobilization with policy and expert work by ControlAI, MIRI and FLI.

PauseAI describes a division of work across the restriction movement. Its theory of change names ControlAI, MIRI and FLI as counterparts in policy development and expert consensus, while emphasizing its own role in public and political pressure. It discusses coordination across countries, common campaigns and responses to AI incidents. This is an explicit account of organizations trying to make their different capacities work together.

The operational structure matters. Executive and chapter leadership coordinate campaign themes with local adaptation. Published microgrant rules assign decisions to the CEO and Organizing Director, normally for awards below €2,000. Before payment, a grant letter specifies the purpose, deliverables and schedule. Small sums can therefore support a distributed network of activities while preserving a common organizational direction.

Stipends have continuing conditions too. Recipients sign agreements, meet with leadership and must keep contributing in alignment with Global priorities. Microgrant reporting and completion affect future eligibility. These are practical mechanisms for sustaining work and accountability across a movement, beyond shared views or a list of affiliated names.

Tallinn’s ledger reports $30,000 in two 2024 payments to Stichting PauseAI. The organization’s roadmap also sketches larger funding scenarios for expanded communications and additional capacity. Its stated methods reject violence and dishonesty. The institution’s significance is the ability to connect funds, organizers, messages and political opportunities into recurring public pressure rather than relying only on spontaneous reactions to the news.

Assessment updated 2026-09-12

Detailed records and research

What the records show

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIPauseAI microgrant programme

Approves small grants and deliverables

Checked 12 September 2026

Published rules assign approval to CEO and Organizing Director, with grant letters specifying purpose, deliverables and schedule.

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIPauseAI volunteer stipend programme

Sets eligibility and renewal conditions

Checked 12 September 2026

Published rules require signed agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities.

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIPauseAI expansion roadmap

Proposes expanded communications capacity

Checked 12 September 2026

PauseAI publishes funding scenarios for PR, narrative production and additional advocacy organizations.

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIPauseAI microgrant programme

Makes future grants conditional on delivery

Checked 12 September 2026

Published microgrant rules connect future support to completion and reporting of agreed outputs.

Jaan TallinnPauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI

$30,000 across two 2024 entries

Checked 12 September 2026

Tallinn reports $20,000 in March and $10,000 in November 2024 for Stichting PauseAI.

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIMachine Intelligence Research Institute

Declared policy counterpart

Checked 12 September 2026

PauseAI’s theory of change names Machine Intelligence Research Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIFuture of Life Institute

Declared policy counterpart

Checked 12 September 2026

PauseAI’s theory of change names Future of Life Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIControlAI

Declared policy counterpart

Checked 12 September 2026

PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.

From the investigation

Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics

The clearest declared division of labor comes from PauseAI Global's theory of change . It names MIRI, the Future of Life Institute, and ControlAI as organizations developing policy and expert consensus, while PauseAI builds public and political pressure. Its strategy includes coordinated national pressure, directing politicians toward policy partners, and rapid responses to AI incidents. Its organization rules locate campaign and communications coordination with executive and chapter leadership, with local adaptation. These are explicit organizational intentions, not evidence that donors direct every campaign. The theory of change rejects violence and dishonesty.

Read the research & sources ↗

Further reading

Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics

Read the original source 1

What the connections say

8 relationships
2

PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAIDeclared policy counterpartControlAI

Checked 12 September 2026

Reported by the cited source

PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role. PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.

Read the original source 1