Builds the organized public pressure behind AI restriction
PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI
PauseAI Global, legally Stichting PauseAI, organizes public pressure for a pause in advanced AI development. It supports chapters, coordinates campaigns and provides grants or stipends for organizers. Its published strategy connects public mobilization with policy and expert work by ControlAI, MIRI and FLI.
PauseAI describes a division of work across the restriction movement. Its theory of change names ControlAI, MIRI and FLI as counterparts in policy development and expert consensus, while emphasizing its own role in public and political pressure. It discusses coordination across countries, common campaigns and responses to AI incidents. This is an explicit account of organizations trying to make their different capacities work together.
The operational structure matters. Executive and chapter leadership coordinate campaign themes with local adaptation. Published microgrant rules assign decisions to the CEO and Organizing Director, normally for awards below €2,000. Before payment, a grant letter specifies the purpose, deliverables and schedule. Small sums can therefore support a distributed network of activities while preserving a common organizational direction.
Stipends have continuing conditions too. Recipients sign agreements, meet with leadership and must keep contributing in alignment with Global priorities. Microgrant reporting and completion affect future eligibility. These are practical mechanisms for sustaining work and accountability across a movement, beyond shared views or a list of affiliated names.
Tallinn’s ledger reports $30,000 in two 2024 payments to Stichting PauseAI. The organization’s roadmap also sketches larger funding scenarios for expanded communications and additional capacity. Its stated methods reject violence and dishonesty. The institution’s significance is the ability to connect funds, organizers, messages and political opportunities into recurring public pressure rather than relying only on spontaneous reactions to the news.
PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI → Machine Intelligence Research Institute
Declared policy counterpart
Checked 12 September 2026
PauseAI’s theory of change names Machine Intelligence Research Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.
PauseAI Global / Stichting PauseAI → Future of Life Institute
Declared policy counterpart
Checked 12 September 2026
PauseAI’s theory of change names Future of Life Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role.
Jaan Tallinn: funding and the division of labor in AI politics
The clearest declared division of labor comes from PauseAI Global's theory of change . It names MIRI, the Future of Life Institute, and ControlAI as organizations developing policy and expert consensus, while PauseAI builds public and political pressure. Its strategy includes coordinated national pressure, directing politicians toward policy partners, and rapid responses to AI incidents. Its organization rules locate campaign and communications coordination with executive and chapter leadership, with local adaptation. These are explicit organizational intentions, not evidence that donors direct every campaign. The theory of change rejects violence and dishonesty.
PauseAI’s theory of change names ControlAI among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role. PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.
PauseAI’s theory of change names Future of Life Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role. PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.
PauseAI’s theory of change names Machine Intelligence Research Institute among organizations developing policy and expert consensus alongside its public-pressure role. PauseAI’s declared strategy; not a signed agreement or evidence of donor command.
PauseAI publishes funding scenarios for PR, narrative production and additional advocacy organizations. Conditional plans, not established expenditure or existing new organizations.
Published rules require signed agreements, meetings and continuing contributions aligned with Global priorities. No individual award, payment or termination case established.
Published microgrant rules connect future support to completion and reporting of agreed outputs. Different from a donor exercising control over PauseAI; awarded agreements not obtained.