A November 2024 discussion paper published by ICMEC Australia for the SaferAI for Children coalition. It presents AI-and-child-protection recommendations, including possible device-level detection and screening in encrypted environments, and was subsequently used in government-facing work.
What later documents actually used
The paper credits collaborative writing by coalition members without assigning individual drafting or final approval. Its page 8 lists possible AI initiatives, including device-level detection and blocking of child sexual abuse material. The 2025 Woolcott review cites the paper and reproduces four proposed AI uses. eSafety’s March 2026 toolkit cites it specifically for investigative triage—categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying patterns. That citation does not establish that the paper originated the toolkit’s separate encryption or identity recommendations.
SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper → eSafety CSEA Safety by Design toolkit (March2026)
is cited to support AI investigative triage in
March2026 toolkit
Printed28/PDF15 footnote34 supports classifiers categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying behavioural patterns. Resource listing alone is not the evidence; actual footnote supports scoped use. Other age/identity/encryption sections have separate ancestry.
SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper → Woolcott review to Tasmania's Premier (2025)
is cited and substantively used in
November2025 review
Printed131/PDF132 cites paper in notes124-125, reproduces four proposed AI uses and discusses reThink. The review then develops information-sharing recommendations from multiple grounds; sole causation or device-scanning adoption not established.
SaferAI November 2024 discussion paper → SaferAI device/encrypted-environment detection proposal
recommends considering
November2024
P8 lists AI screening in encrypted environments and device-level CSAM detection/blocking among possible initiatives to support; no technical architecture, contract or deployed capability follows.
P8 lists AI screening in encrypted environments and device-level CSAM detection/blocking among possible initiatives to support; no technical architecture, contract or deployed capability follows.
Printed131/PDF132 cites paper in notes124-125, reproduces four proposed AI uses and discusses reThink. The review then develops information-sharing recommendations from multiple grounds; sole causation or device-scanning adoption not established.
Printed28/PDF15 footnote34 supports classifiers categorising reports, prioritising cases and identifying behavioural patterns. Resource listing alone is not the evidence; actual footnote supports scoped use. Other age/identity/encryption sections have separate ancestry.