Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Proposed statutory authority
A proposed independent body with enforcement and remedy powers; not an established regulator.
The proposed statutory body would decide on launch blocking or withdrawal where an unacceptable human-rights risk is established, informed by AISI advice. It would also have testing, sanction and remedy powers. The report does not enact an appointment process, appeal route or final allocation of functions. An existing body could expand. The government response and bill clauses are needed to determine who would actually decide and how a decision could be challenged.
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026 → Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK
2026-09-14
Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established.
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026 → Recommends statutory enforcement powers → Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK
2026-09-14
Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established. Recommendations 226–227 and 233; the oversight body would decide, with AISI advice. An existing body could be expanded. No such power is enacted by this report.