Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Committee recommendations
A report adopted September 9 and published September 14, recommending an AI Bill.
Paragraphs 226–227 recommend testing, sanctions and remedies, with launch blocking or withdrawal where systems pose an unacceptable risk to human rights. Paragraphs 231–233 propose compulsory access to powerful models and specifications for AISI: it would advise the oversight body, which would make intervention decisions. These are proposed powers, with legislation still to come. An existing body could expand and the functions could be combined.
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026 → Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK
2026-09-14
Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established.
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026 → UK AI Security Institute
2026-09-14
AISI would review powerful models and receive specifications under statute.
Joint Committee on Human Rights → Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026
2026-09-14
Formal minutes record the committee's adoption.
Joint Committee on Human Rights → Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026
2026-09-14
Publication date on the report's cover.
Joint Committee on Human Rights → Adopts committee report → Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026
2026-09-14
Formal minutes record the committee's adoption. Not passage of a bill.
Joint Committee on Human Rights → Publishes recommendations → Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026
2026-09-14
Publication date on the report's cover. Publication time within the day is unknown.
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026 → Recommends statutory enforcement powers → Proposed statutory AI oversight body — UK
2026-09-14
Proposed powers include testing, sanctions and remedies, plus blocking launch or requiring withdrawal where an unacceptable risk to human rights is established. Recommendations 226–227 and 233; the oversight body would decide, with AISI advice. An existing body could be expanded. No such power is enacted by this report.
Human Rights and the Regulation of AI — September 2026 → Recommends compulsory model access → UK AI Security Institute
2026-09-14
AISI would review powerful models and receive specifications under statute. Recommendations 231–233; AISI would advise the oversight decision-maker. Functions might be combined. This is proposed, not current compulsory authority.