Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Earlier research
All five disclosed co-funders connect to the same corrected March 2021 report. Publication, authored recommendations and MPA’s later parliamentary citation remain distinct routes.
Solid lines: documented in a cited record. Dashed: reported or inferred. Hollow arrows: proposed powers. Choose a connection for its evidence.
No grant amount, contract, editorial veto or donor instruction was acquired. The report says validation workshops excluded funders; that is a reported method. MPA quotes the executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation 4.
Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) → published the co-funded research report → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
March2021 corrected version
Corrected March2021 report names authors Janjeva, Reid and Moiseienko. The authors claim findings were independent of funders;77interviews and two funder-excluding validation workshops are self-described methods. Funding, primary-data contribution and final editorial control are not interchangeable.
UK Intellectual Property Office → is disclosed as a co-funder → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
March2021 report disclosure
Reported by the cited source
RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.
Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired
Alliance for Intellectual Property → is disclosed as a co-funder → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
March2021 report disclosure
Reported by the cited source
RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.
Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired
Motion Picture Association → is disclosed as a co-funder → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
March2021 report disclosure
Reported by the cited source
RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.
Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired
Industry Trust — report-disclosed funder → is disclosed as a co-funder → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
March2021 report disclosure
Reported by the cited source
RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.
Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired
Premier League — report-disclosed funder → is disclosed as a co-funder → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
March2021 report disclosure
Reported by the cited source
RUSI acknowledges this named co-funder alongside four others. No amount, transfer date, contract, publication veto or instruction of recommendations is established. Exact legal contracting entity is not obtained where the disclosure gives only an organisational name.
Payment status: Funding acknowledged; award/payment instrument and allocation unacquired
Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report → recommends verification and proportionate financial interventions → RUSI business-verification and financial-disruption recommendations
March2021 corrected report
Recommendation4 seeks record/verification to extent possible and resources for compliance. Recommendation14 proposes that financial institutions seek existing lists and take appropriate actions including termination orSAR. Recommendation15 promotes reasonable identity best practice without waiting for formal KYBC. These are authored proposals, not established list entitlements or performed disruptions.
MPA FDF0068 evidence — internal10May2022 → quotes the2021 report in parliamentary advocacy → Taking the Profit Out of IP Crime — corrected March2021 report
MPA internal10May2022
Main§18 and footnote12 name and cite this report, quoting its executive-summary KYBC passage. That is a concrete co-funder→report→later-citation route. Quotation is from PDF12 executive summary, not identical numbered recommendation4; funding did not itself prove dictation or government adoption.