AI policy & political power

Sanders: from AI advocacy to proposed federal power

Follow consultation, legislative sponsorship, campaign infrastructure and open opposition. Select a person or organization for its role and the supporting records.

Choose a subject or a numbered connection.

1Consulted on announced framework2designated principal Senate campaign committee3Jointly announces forthcoming legislation4Jointly announces forthcoming legislation5Chairs6Senate member7ITIF publicly opposes8Hosts advocacy petition9Solicits congressional support10Would create cabinet-level AI regulator

Solid lines: documented in a cited record. Dashed: reported or inferred. Hollow arrows: proposed powers. Choose a connection for its evidence.

The regulatory powers are proposed. ControlAI’s consultation is self-reported; the legal entity and any fee are unidentified. A principal campaign committee is not evidence of an AI-safety donation. Endorsements of earlier bills remain separate.

What the connections say

10 relationships
1

ControlAIConsulted on announced frameworkBan Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal

Public account 2026-09-09; exact consultation dates not established

ControlAI publicly states it consulted on the Sanders–Casar framework. Self-attributed participation; no staff correspondence, contract, individual drafter, exact clauses, or sole authorship established. The group's narrower position differs from the framework's advanced-AI pause. Consulting legal entity and payment not identified.

Read the original source 1
2

Friends of Bernie Sandersdesignated principal Senate campaign committeeBernie Sanders

2025-01-20; current reporting snapshot observed 2026-09-11

Bernard Sanders's January 20, 2025 Form 2 designates Friends of Bernie Sanders (FEC C00411330) for the 2030 Senate election. The current FEC committee overview reports separately bounded 2025–2026 finances through June 30, 2026. Principal campaign authority, not evidence that the campaign financed the bill, paid ControlAI, or received money from any named AI-safety donor or foundation.

Read the original sources 3
7

Center for Data Innovation / ITIFITIF publicly opposesBan Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposal

2026-09-03

ITIF published Daniel Castro's criticism of the proposed ban, urging continued AI development alongside safety work. Source attributes statement to ITIF. Existing cdi combines CDI and ITIF; do not attribute statement to former CDI fellow Eva Behrens or infer donor direction.

Read the original source 1
10

Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — Sanders/Casar proposalWould create cabinet-level AI regulatorProposed federal AI regulator — Sanders/Casar

Checked 2026-09-11

The sponsor summary proposes a new agency to enforce the ban, monitor frontier AI, supervise capability removal and destruction, and establish rules and review processes needed to end the pause. Proposed powers; no operational regulator or enacted authority established.

Read the original source 1