Tech Against Terrorism

Online Harms Foundation → implements the initiative → Tech Against Terrorism

TAT names OHF as implementer; this separates the initiative from its legal company and funders.

Tech Against Terrorism → operates the classification and alerting service → Terrorist Content Analytics Platform

Operator accounts explain in-house collection/verification and advisory alerts; provider enforcement remains separate.

Adam Hadley → was described by QuantSpark as also running TAT → Tech Against Terrorism

2026-04-20 – 2026-04-20

Reported by the cited source

Company author capsule establishes a reported shared leadership role; it does not specify content-approval powers or an OHF management contract.

Canada Centre — Public Safety Canada → engaged TAT on support for smaller platforms → Tech Against Terrorism

2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05

Reported by the cited source

Named intermediary and engagement purpose are explicit in the Canadian record; no classification mandate or joint legal entity is established.

US funding for TAT — process reported in October 2023 → identified TAT as intended funding recipient → Tech Against Terrorism

2023-10-05 – 2023-10-05

Reported by the cited source

Canadian department’s October 2023 account of a process, not proof of a completed US award or receipt. No amount is supplied or inferred.

Tech Against Terrorism → partnered in the Canadian launch → TCAP 2.0 Canadian launch — May 2023

2023-05-01 – 2023-05-05

Reported by the cited source

The same departmental record identifies TAT as launch partner. No actual project-performance acceptance or instalment payment is established by the event.

Home Office TCAP pilot — pending September 2026 → names TAT as proposed supplier → Tech Against Terrorism

2026-09-02 – 2026-09-02

The notice names TAT and a supplier PPON; the notice does not establish its company-number signatory or OHF–QuantSpark subcontract terms.

DIS Standard2024 — commenced 22 December → names it as an example of independent expert verification tools → Tech Against Terrorism

DIS commencement anchor; not observed procurement or use.

Section 6 Note 2 supplies a legal recognition route for known pro-terror material. Examples are nonexclusive; no purchase requirement, actual deployment or incorporation of every private classification into law.

Tech Against Terrorism → applies source and content assessment through in-house experts → TCAP inclusion and verification rules

Public summary describes human source/content judgment against policy. Full verification procedure requires a form and was not acquired; no donor item-selection right is supplied.

Tech Against Terrorism → reported correcting URL-availability statuses after platform disputes → Terrorist Content Analytics Platform

December 2021–November 2022 reporting period, not a current API service-level promise.

Reported by the cited source

Year 2 report records 36 disputes, all automated status issues; 35 statuses changed and one remained active. These are not 36 terrorist-label reversals or restored user posts. Response target then was seven working days.

Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism → contributes funding according to TAT’s account → Tech Against Terrorism

Reported by the cited source

TAT About funding passage names GIFCT support; no amount, period, donor agreement or classification veto is established.

Tech Against Terrorism → reported building an archive and reusable hash interfaces → TCAP Archive and Research Portal

2024-12-20 – 2024-12-20

Reported by the cited source

December 2024 operator account reports over 46,000 files and 182,000 hashes, distinct units. It attributes LLM identification/classification support to Public Safety Canada without a cost allocation or acceptance record.