National assessment authorities behind an international list-distribution service
WIPO ALERT national contributors
WIPO ALERT national contributors supply lists developed under their own national processes. They retain responsibility for assessment, accuracy and updates, while WIPO provides a distribution layer for authorised advertising users.
Assessment and review
The 2019 framework describes reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement or facilitation under national processes, rather than requiring a final judgment for every entry. Contributors are responsible for prompt removal updates and retain national challenge routes. The FAQ describes notifying other contributors when a shared entry is deleted elsewhere. That notification does not force deletion from every national list or require advertisers to restore business; the published Brazil and Japan procedures illustrate differing processes.
WIPO ALERT national contributors → WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution
supply national assessments and maintain entries
2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry.
Affected website operators — list review role → WIPO ALERT national contributors
seek correction through applicable national process
2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed.
WIPO ALERT — advertising distribution → WIPO ALERT national contributors
describes cross-list deletion notification
FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements.
2019 framework uses reasonable suspicion of deliberate infringement/facilitation under national processes; contributors retain accuracy and prompt-removal update responsibility. Not a final judgment on each entry.
2019 framework preserves national review/appeal; current landing refers concerns to the national body. Brazil/Japan summaries differ, so no single global review clock is imposed.
FAQ describes notifying other contributors when another list deletes a common entry. This does not force deletion from every list or restored advertisements.