Reporting parent connecting verification revenue and legal defence
DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.
DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. is the publicly reporting corporate issuer for the DoubleVerify business and a plaintiff in the 2025 Adalytics complaint. Its consolidated filings describe the commercial model behind advertising verification and suitability services.
Revenue and legal activity
The FY2025 Form 10-K attributes 90% of revenue to advertisers, principally transaction or impression measurement fees, and 10% to supply-side customers, including minimum guarantees and tiered pricing. In April 2025, a Paul Hastings preservation letter represented Holdings to Check My Ads; in May, Holdings and DoubleVerify Inc. sued Adalytics. The filing's consolidated business description does not identify the exact contracting entity for every historical FilmOn service.
Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination.
DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. → 14April2025 DV preservation demand
issued counsel demand under anticipated litigation
2025-04-14 – 2025-04-14
Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope.
DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. → DV v Adalytics complaint —12May2025
is named plaintiff in filed complaint
2025-05-12 – 2025-05-12
Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.
DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. → DV brand suitability classification service
reports consolidated configuration and service model
FY2025 report
The issuer describes configuration/classification and customer feedback in product development. Consolidated disclosure is not proof of the exact historical FilmOn contracting party.
DV advertiser customers — disclosed class → DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.
accounted for reported90percent of group revenue
Fiscal2025
FY2025 filing reports90% of revenue from advertisers, mainly measured transaction/impression fees, with some capped spend-based fees. No absolute sum or fee per exclusion inferred.
DV supply-side customers — disclosed class → DoubleVerify Holdings Inc.
accounted for reported10percent of group revenue
Fiscal2025
FY2025 filing reports10% supply-side revenue with minimum guarantees/tiered pricing. This does not establish biased classification or a payment tied to a specific exclusion.
FY2025 filing reports90% of revenue from advertisers, mainly measured transaction/impression fees, with some capped spend-based fees. No absolute sum or fee per exclusion inferred.
FY2025 filing reports10% supply-side revenue with minimum guarantees/tiered pricing. This does not establish biased classification or a payment tied to a specific exclusion.
The issuer describes configuration/classification and customer feedback in product development. Consolidated disclosure is not proof of the exact historical FilmOn contracting party.
Firm appears on the preservation letter and later complaint, with Bondi among listed counsel and Kwame Manley signing the complaint. Representation does not establish finance or additional-client coordination.
Letter invokes possible defamation/tortious interference/injurious falsehood and asks preservation of DV/Adalytics/government-communication materials. It is not a court order or finding of enforceable scope.
Stamped12May2025 original complaint names DoubleVerify Holdings Inc. and DoubleVerify Inc. as plaintiffs, Adalytics Research LLC as sole defendant. No later case status acquired.