Announced rights assessment within an age-assurance infrastructure project

Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

This is the review of AgeAware's child-rights and wider human-rights implications that euCONSENT reported commissioning in January 2025. Its project update named Emma Day and Sabine Witting of Tech Legality as intended co-leads and described a commissioning route through academics on the team.

What was announced

The 9 January project account named Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair as team academics through whom the review was commissioned. It described Day and Witting as intended leaders and called the work independent. The retained corpus contains the commissioning account, rather than the completed review, fee, contract or clearance terms; completion and the substance of any findings remain unestablished.

What the records show

euCONSENTCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

reported commissioning

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

euCONSENT's project update reported commissioning a review of AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact through team academics. The article identifies the later ASBL project context; the contracting legal instrument, fee, clearance terms and completion are unknown.

Sonia LivingstoneCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

was named among team academics through whom review was commissioned

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

The project account said the review was commissioned through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair. This identifies an attributed commissioning route, not three personally executed contracts.

Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025AgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept

was commissioned to examine rights implications of

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

The proposed review's stated subject was AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact. The participant called it independent; no independence or completion audit was performed.

Emma DayCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

was named as intended review co-lead

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

The project update named Emma Day, alongside Sabine Witting, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.

Sabine WittingCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

was named as intended review co-lead

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

The project update named Sabine Witting, alongside Emma Day, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.

Further reading

UK age-assurance market: instruments, interests and limits

Read the original source 1

What the connections say

5 relationships
1

euCONSENTreported commissioningCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

Reported by the cited source

euCONSENT's project update reported commissioning a review of AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact through team academics. The article identifies the later ASBL project context; the contracting legal instrument, fee, clearance terms and completion are unknown.

Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.

Read the original source 1
2

Emma Daywas named as intended review co-leadCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

Reported by the cited source

The project update named Emma Day, alongside Sabine Witting, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.

Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.

Read the original source 1
3

Sabine Wittingwas named as intended review co-leadCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

Reported by the cited source

The project update named Sabine Witting, alongside Emma Day, of Tech Legality as intended leaders of the commissioned review. No direct personal contract or completed work is inferred.

Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.

Read the original source 1
4

Sonia Livingstonewas named among team academics through whom review was commissionedCommissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

Reported by the cited source

The project account said the review was commissioned through team academics Simone van der Hof, Sonia Livingstone and Abhilash Nair. This identifies an attributed commissioning route, not three personally executed contracts.

Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.

Read the original source 1
5

Commissioned AgeAware rights review · reported January 2025was commissioned to examine rights implications ofAgeAware interoperability proposal and proof of concept

Reported 9 January 2025; exact commission date and delivery date not established.

Reported by the cited source

The proposed review's stated subject was AgeAware's child-rights and broader human-rights impact. The participant called it independent; no independence or completion audit was performed.

Specific commissioned-work bridge to named contributors already documented in the eSafety-cited CSEA principles report; not a claim that eSafety commissioned AgeAware or that either report dictated policy.

Read the original source 1