AI ownership and board power — proposals
Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.
Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
RED THREADS · THE COLLECTION
Donors, foundations, grants, ownership and the obligations attached to resources.
27 results
Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.
Follow Andreessen's personal political receipt, a16z's investment and advocacy routes, and Meta's documented corporate oversight role.
Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Follow funding into recruitment, new organizations and research capacity.
Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.
Follow the joint programme and its institutional connections.
FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.
DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.
A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.
Follow grants, lab access, people and public-sector work around the evaluator.
Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.
Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.
Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.
Karp's company connects AI suppliers to state operations. Its founders, customers, hosts and courts hold different powers.
Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.
Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.
AI4TRUST reports a final warning system, a textual component, a human-validation dashboard and user evaluation. Each finding belongs to its stated component and test.
Follow the closing LTFF into Commons and the new Transformative AI Fund.
Statewatch endorsed a CSA objection and an OSA safeguards letter. The WeProtect Secretariat supported the CSA initiative with safeguards. DFF separately reports funding Liberty’s TCN challenge.
The provider-establishment DSC decides project vetting and request conditions. The researcher supplies eligibility and funding information; providers have a bounded amendment route.
DFF describes staged 2025 selection rounds, March 2026 board adoption and peer selection of the June round. Staff and the published terms support that process.
All five disclosed co-funders connect to the same corrected March 2021 report. Publication, authored recommendations and MPA’s later parliamentary citation remain distinct routes.
AliExpress must fund the trustee; the Commission approved Ankura and controls its mandate. QA and monitoring reports should travel back through specified channels.
Named grants establish resources; KR’s statutes establish internal selection and appointment rights. CMA’s two funding charts describe a changed mix without explaining its cause.