Standards pressure

How outside reports become vendor policy

DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.

Choose a subject or a numbered connection.

1announced future default enablement2reported enabled default3was reported distributed to over100 partners4reported nearly30 category implementations5publishes reviewed-notice and response aggregates6is named as public-data origin by DV7reports source selection and further assessment8is described as an input to vendor category9describes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removal10was announced as planned integration11is described as integrated in DV testimonial12is listed as member since1April202513is disclosed in contribution band overGBP25000

Solid lines: documented in a cited record. Dashed: reported or inferred. Hollow arrows: proposed powers. Choose a connection for its evidence.

Incoming reports differ from outbound notices; the exact files used by DV remain unknown. Neither a public-data source nor the over-£25,000 contribution band establishes approval rights. Planned integration and later reported implementation are distinct.

What the connections say

13 relationships
4

DoubleVerify — product and membership brandreported nearly30 category implementationsDV platform partners — reported implementation class

2025-04-24 – 2025-04-24

Reported by the cited source

April24 release says nearly30 platforms implemented Highly Illicit and offers the category free to all platforms, including nonclients. No named platform logs, blocked-site count or raw-IWF-data redistribution licence proved.

Read the original source 1
5

National Center for Missing & Exploited Childrenpublishes reviewed-notice and response aggregatesNCMEC public outbound-notification tables — examined2021–2023 family

Reporting2021–2023; first publication dates not established

Methodology describes staff visual review and tracked notifications, including repeated notices and possible upstream contacts.2023columns separate CSAM, non-CSAM exploitative images of identified victims and predatory text. Mixed response tables are not permanent whole-company labels or unique-incident counts.

Read the original sources 4
7

DoubleVerify — product and membership brandreports source selection and further assessmentDV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknown

2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13

Reported by the cited source

DV says it reviewed three years/over300domains or providers, cross-checked existing classifications, assessed remaining sites and excluded large well-moderated social/search services. Exact years/files/columns/provider-domain mapping unknown; no misuse finding.

Read the original source 1
8

DV-described public NCMEC input — versions unknownis described as an input to vendor categoryHighly Illicit: Do Not Monetize — DV category

2025-02-13 – 2025-02-13

Reported by the cited source

DV's own account connects selected public material to its new Highly Illicit policy through additional judgment. The acquired2021–2023tables explain why units matter but are not proven to be the exact files used.

Read the original sources 3
9

Internet Watch Foundationdescribes daily rechecks and same-day obsolete-entry removalIWF assessed URL List — DV input scope

2025report section; publication date unknown

Reported by the cited source

IWF says URLs are rechecked daily, removed the same day when relevant content is absent, with twice-daily list updates. This is upstream maintenance evidence, not observed DV reclassification or restored placements.

Read the original source 1