Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
Assurance versus results
DCMS appointed PA for OSDI assurance. PUBLIC reports prototype testing and later credits OSDI practices in a separate STCF evaluation. A dated expert group supplied advice.
Solid lines: documented in a cited record. Dashed: reported or inferred. Hollow arrows: proposed powers. Choose a connection for its evidence.
PA’s report is not acquired. PUBLIC’s TRL4/testing account is not production acceptance, nor proof it was the redacted CDDP subcontractor. Poppy Wood’s advisory role is not procurement veto power.
UK Department for Digital,Culture,Media and Sport — historical buyer → appointed PA as external OSDI evaluator → PA Consulting
2021-09-23
23September2021deliverylead account describes assurance of process/resources/spending/quality andseniorcivilservantreporting. No originalscopeagreement/finalassessment acquired.
PA Consulting → had responsibilities and priorities agreed with government and consortium → Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI
Governmentaccount saysDCMS agreedwithPA incollaborationwithFaculty/PUBLIC. This is described processagreement, not unilateral supplierapproval or acquiredcontract.
PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand → is named in the delivery consortium → Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI
Same official OSDIconsortium; scope andsupplieridentity notproofPUBLICheldredactedCDDPsubcontract.
PUBLIC — programme/supplier brand → reports delivering a TRL4 prototype for DCMS review and testing → OSDI TRL4 evaluation sandbox — PUBLIC account
Reported by the cited source
Commercialcase study claimsdataset/framework/DPIA/3pilotfirms/userguidance; finalstageproposesliveoperation. No originalframework,pilotresults or acceptancecertificate acquired.
Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI → is expressly credited as a source of evaluation practices → Safety Tech Challenge Fund Round2 evaluation —2024
Reported by the cited source
PUBLICcreditsOSDIalongsideotherinputs; criteria includeperformance,robustness,scalability,privacy/security,userfeedback. OriginalOSDIframework notlinked, footnote17homepageonly.
OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021 → advises scope direction and legally robust data stewardship → Online Safety Data Initiative — OSDI
Government says group had encouraged userexperience emphasis; actualminutes,whichadvice accepted and approvalinstrument not obtained.
Poppy Wood → was listed as Reset Tech Senior Advisor in the group → OSDI Online Harms Expert Group — July2021
2021-07-02
July2021professionalrole is a concreteadvisoryroute; laterResetUKdirectorship separate. No currentemployment,procurementvote,datacontrol or deploymentveto inferred.