AI foundations & creators
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
RED THREADS · THE COLLECTION
Safety campaigns, proposed restrictions, evaluators and the institutions shaping AI.
40 results
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.
Follow Andreessen's personal political receipt, a16z's investment and advocacy routes, and Meta's documented corporate oversight role.
Accenture and Faculty connect model assessment to an existing Claude business relationship.
Liberty and Privacy International filed a separate complaint and submitted arguments. The tribunal denied concealment of basic Apple case details while keeping the March hearing private.
Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.
The collective’s public roster connects to tools, publications, a bug-bounty program and a vendor challenge.
California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from…
Civic Shout sells supporters and traffic, recruits coalition participants and rewards distribution through distinct credit and cash programs. A public filing identifies a political purchaser; a charitable project offers another route…
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Reported spending, professional roles and the UK-US disclosure link show the machinery behind congressional advocacy.
Follow funding into recruitment, new organizations and research capacity.
Explore grants, research resources, people and the institutions using their work.
GDI contributed existing keyword resources; FBK edited D2.1 and recorded internal coordinator review. The document’s sampling and methodological choices are inspectable.
DCMS appointed PA for OSDI assurance. PUBLIC reports prototype testing and later credits OSDI practices in a separate STCF evaluation. A dated expert group supplied advice.
Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.
Follow the joint programme and its institutional connections.
Follow evaluator admission, fiscal approval and named research awards.
A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Paid grant instalments, three government contracts, commercial rights and a safety-framework conference connect the evaluator to funders and public institutions.
Follow the evaluator into philanthropic grants, venture investment, EA career organizations and RAND research.
See the shared supplier, its lab relationships and the proposed response to testing failures.
Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.
Follow grants, lab access, people and public-sector work around the evaluator.
Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.
Founder votes, purchasing power and AI distribution create different forms of authority around Karp's company.
Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.
Founders, executives and steering organizations around the new coalition.
Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.