AI ownership and board power — proposals
Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.
Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
RED THREADS · THE COLLECTION
Donors, foundations, grants, ownership and the obligations attached to resources.
38 results
Compare El-Sayed’s proposed public board majority with Sanders’s proposed equity fund and commission.
Follow Andreessen's personal political receipt, a16z's investment and advocacy routes, and Meta's documented corporate oversight role.
Accenture and Faculty connect model assessment to an existing Claude business relationship.
Follow Pliny’s grant, reported contracts and the personnel links into credited frontier-lab testing.
Civic Shout sells supporters and traffic, recruits coalition participants and rewards distribution through distinct credit and cash programs. A public filing identifies a political purchaser; a charitable project offers another route…
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Follow funding into recruitment, new organizations and research capacity.
Explore grants, research resources, people and the institutions using their work.
Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.
Follow the joint programme and its institutional connections.
FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.
Follow evaluator admission, fiscal approval and named research awards.
DV describes selecting public NCMEC material, conducting further assessment and introducing a Highly Illicit category. IWF’s assessed URL input is separate from DV’s membership and contribution band.
A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.
Follow the named relationships between the main participants in this part of the investigation.
Paid grant instalments, three government contracts, commercial rights and a safety-framework conference connect the evaluator to funders and public institutions.
Follow the evaluator into philanthropic grants, venture investment, EA career organizations and RAND research.
See the shared supplier, its lab relationships and the proposed response to testing failures.
Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.
Follow grants, lab access, people and public-sector work around the evaluator.
Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.
Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.
Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.
Founder votes, purchasing power and AI distribution create different forms of authority around Karp's company.
Compare a documented route into government guidance with PauseAI’s declared division of labor.
Founders, executives and steering organizations around the new coalition.
Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.
Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.
AI4TRUST reports a final warning system, a textual component, a human-validation dashboard and user evaluation. Each finding belongs to its stated component and test.
Follow the closing LTFF into Commons and the new Transformative AI Fund.