Money. Identity. Technology.
Follow the money. Find the decision.
RED THREADS · THE COLLECTION
Paid messaging, advertising lists, information classifiers and access to platform data.
37 results
FTI’s 2024/25 audit concluded positively on readiness, reported zero approvals and found the inspected applications incomplete or invalid. A later voluntary tracker provides a separate, unmatched account.
Follow Andreessen's personal political receipt, a16z's investment and advocacy routes, and Meta's documented corporate oversight role.
California has moved from a proposal to enacted rules for the organizations that assess AI. SB813 gives GovOps responsibility for qualifying independent verifiers, with criteria due by January2028. AB1405 adds a registry and, from…
CMA asks for creator/advertiser checks, platform review before monetization and sanctions. Its crisis revenue/refund proposal has an explicit regulator response: specific monetization practices were not recommended.
Civic Shout sells supporters and traffic, recruits coalition participants and rewards distribution through distinct credit and cash programs. A public filing identifies a political purchaser; a charitable project offers another route…
White Bullet describes an official-list index and a separate proprietary risk index. Peer39 markets an exclusion offering. Gambling Commission duties give a distinct contractual route for licensees.
eGumball sought emergency delisting relief. The 2023 appeal reversed that provisional relief; the 2025 appeal rejected anti-SLAPP protection at its first step. FilmOn supplied an expressly applied legal framework.
Follow funding into recruitment, new organizations and research capacity.
Operation Creative separates rightsholder referrals, police assessment and distribution to advertising recipients. Operators can challenge action; police removal has a stated evidential condition.
GDI contributed existing keyword resources; FBK edited D2.1 and recorded internal coordinator review. The document’s sampling and methodological choices are inspectable.
Full Fact seeks broader crisis scope, meaningful data access for accredited fact-checkers and stronger supervision. Ofcom retains a narrower formal channel and declines central coordination and routine submission of every analysis.
Multi-year philanthropy supports policy capacity; recurring organizing support has its own published conditions.
FCDO reports support to the named GDI operation. The Commission records AI4TRUST project funding and a contribution for its German participant. These are two documented channels.
The historical Oracle segment and IAS input connect GDI ratings to buyer choices. Both named intermediaries later announced exits from the relevant service or input.
GDI describes publisher rating appeals and reassessment. Its UK operator’s policy separately offers qualified consideration of concerns about research outputs.
The proposed process carries authorized claims through WIPO formalities to payment providers. WIPO reports a manual pilot; its programme separately plans deployment.
A named fund manager, a charitable account, a fellowship and a documented film grant.
WIPO ALERT carries national assessments to approved advertising users. Contributors retain responsibilities and access choices; users choose which lists to use. Review begins in the relevant national process.
See the shared supplier, its lab relationships and the proposed response to testing failures.
Two financing arrangements explain obligations that a donor list alone would miss.
Section 175 gives the Secretary a direction route through Ofcom. A notice can require a public statement and information. The provider’s criteria-based crisis determination remains a separate decision.
Follow historical donor support into the institution, then distinguish its leadership roles.
Oak reports three-year support to these five recipients. Each amount belongs to its own grant year and purpose. The arrows have equal weight; they do not measure financial influence.
Oak’s 2023 report records four three-year awards. Each arrow retains its own amount and purpose. No grant is allocated to the later complaint or a named classification decision.
Founder votes, purchasing power and AI distribution create different forms of authority around Karp's company.
Adalytics research and CMA’s claimed advocacy precede the February 2025 requests to DV, MRC and TAG. TAG reports no investigated BSC violations; DV disputes interpretation and reports additional safeguards.
DV Holdings’ counsel issued a preservation demand, and CMA publicly objected. The later complaint names both DV legal entities as plaintiffs and Adalytics as defendant; it separately alleges coordination with CMA.
Separate disclosed commercial placements from the people and stories Paul circulates.
Follow consultation, legislative sponsorship, campaign infrastructure and open opposition. Select a person or organization for its role and the supporting records.
Follow donor payments into ControlAI, grant allocation and AI-policy organizations.